w3: How do we participate in Web 2.0? How to create the modern culture?

 How do we participate in Web 2.0? How to create the modern culture?


I think people need knowledge accumulation to generate wisdom, but knowledge accumulation takes a lot of time. Especially people have limited memory. If all knowledge needs to be stored in the brain, then people will spend a lifetime to remember. But with the help of search engines, you only need to know what to find, remember the "library index", and then call it out when you need to call it out. The speed of generating wisdom through knowledge has been greatly increased. The emergence of web2.0 has brought about a revolution in information, and a series of shared information led by Wikipedia has appeared. In my personal experience of editing Wikipedia, I have felt the joy of using my ability to spread some information across language boundaries. I believe this is a very meaningful thing for the spread and intersection of culture.

But the birth of all events is not only one side. I think that while web 2.0 brings a lot of interactive information, all sources of information have become diversified, and people need to spend more time to distinguish true and false information, which also brings There is also a trend that I call "information anxiety". People have been lost in the vast ocean of information, and even if they desperately reduce the amount of information they consume, they still feel breathless.

So I think modern culture must maintain its authenticity and usability while maintaining its original convenience and dissemination. From a personal perspective, everyone needs to have the basic ability to identify information. On the other hand, network managers also need to deal with false information in a timely manner.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more