Blogging through Wikipedia (2021)

How to add references to a Wikipedia article (Yerin Lee) * How to find reliable sources for research * What are the pros and cons of using NAVER vs. GOOGLE for research purposes. First of all, Wikipedia is described as a socially developing pro-social community rather than a profit-seeking one. Members of the Wikipedia community share common practices and norms. It is a culture of cooperation. The Wikipedia community can be more understood as "pro-social" in that it is intentional, spontaneous, and acts that benefit others. Of course, even if the intention is good, it cannot be unconditionally supported. However, features such as open content/transparency/integrity/non-discrimination/intrusive, and various technical censorship enhance reliability and gain a lot of support. This is supported by the FOSS movement. According to the professor's lecture, we can increase the reliability of our data with reliable sources. To tell you how, it's data like Google Scholar and Go

 1. summary Wikipedia is a highly accessible and open dictionary content that is easily accessible to many people. In Wikipedia, many people formed a society through various social activities. Also, the characteristics of the open community have open content, transparency, integrity, an so on.  We should have a sense of responsibility and trust to protect the value of transparency and integrity. 2. interesting In fact, I was familiar with Wikipedia's openness. However, in fact, the most important thing that Wikipedia should strive to protect its credibility is not Wikipedia itself, but Wikipedia users. Maybe Wikipedia itself felt like a Wikipedia user.It was so impressive that Wikipedia was an open dictionary with the same provider and recipient of information. 3. discussion What is a reasonable way for Wikipedia to secure user reliability and accountability? Now, of course, administrators continue to manage document environments, but the number of administrators is far smaller tha

If you use either search engine for research, I think Google is more useful. First, if we enter the contents in Google's search box, related definitions, news articles, and related papers appear at the top. Therefore, if we use Google for research, we can get materials that help our research without having to click and move pages. On the other hand, if we enter the contents in the Naver search box, other related search words and other issues appear next to the results. And below it, there is a section (in Korean, "지식인") that the general public talked about regarding the search. These are not reliable data to study. Second, Google has more diverse data. Google also has Korean data, and the number of overseas data is relatively higher than Naver. For studies that require a variety of overseas cases, Google is more suitable as a search engine.

 1）Summary Now, the birth of a book should look like this: 1. Editing planning (forecasting the market) and manuscripts (but the market may become less important, why? Because digital printing technology has developed so that it does not need to print 3000 copies at a time! Book publishing will become more accessible to the people in the era of digital printing). 2. Author submission and editing process. 3. The issuance department (marketing center) conducts pre-sales. 4. The publisher performs digital printing according to the number of reservations. So it is very easy to publish a book now. Of course, the cost of each published book will vary according to different publishers. 2）New knowledge learned With the advent of web.2.0, the original traditional published books are different from the current published books. Now the publishing of books is rapidly developed under the impetus of modern digital printing technology. Due to the reduced cost and improved quality of small-batch print

 1. summary The writer says culture as the way people live. People live in a society in a variety of ways, and culture is created in them. Among the many concepts that arise in society, cooperation and conflict resolution have quite similar meanings. In Wikipedia, conflict and cooperation all occur, and this is not a bad thing. People create reliable documents in conflict and cooperation in a society called Wikipedia. 2. interesting It seemed very theoretical, but it was impressive that conflict and cooperation were on the same page. I expect that the two conceptual definitions themselves are not similar, but both have similar social implications for creating ultimately more reliable articles. 3. discussion   But I don't think I've ever figured out exactly the type of conflict that arises within Wikipedia. What kind of conflict does Wikipedia have?

 1.  There are two complementary postures at the heart of Wikipedia collaboration: the stances of “Neutral Point of View” (NPOV) and good faith. Whereas other communities may have a culture of good faith (i.e., assume good faith on the part of others, and acting with patience, civility, and humor), few are concerned with producing an encyclopedia.  C ollaborative culture  refers to a set of assumptions, values, meanings, and actions pertaining to working together within a community. Jenkins defines participatory culture as one in which there are low barriers of engagement, support for creation and sharing, and some form of mentorship or socialization, and members believe that their contributions matter and they “feel some degree of social connection with one another.” By these criteria, Wikipedia would qualify. Wiki is the best example of this notion of “regenerative” or “recursive” feedback.  Editing in wiki is agile and manageable. In principle, there are three levels of authority

 My thoughts are by reading "Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia" in Chapter 3 'Good Faith Collaboration'  and in Chapter 4 of "The Puzzle of Openness". 1）Summary in Chapter 3 'Good Faith Collaboration' : Introduced the origin and history of "collaboration culture". A detailed description of Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. Correctly explained what is a neutral and unbiased view in Wikipedia. Some scholars have proposed many technologies to promote the collaboration and enhancement of Wikipedia, and this technology is one of the elements of Wikipedia's success. And need to strengthen the patience of the spirit of assistance. All contributors on Wikipedia should be respected. And mutual respect is the most basic kind of courtesy. The collaborative culture of Wikipedia-"Neutral View" (NPOV) and a sincere attitude require everyone's joint efforts. in Chapter 4 of "The Puzzle of Openness": It expla

  Summary The central aspiration in pursuing a universal encyclopedia is to increase access to information. It opens up opportunities and abilities for everyone. Wikipedia users share common norms and rules. We also rely on each other and give friendly feedback. However, it can be difficult to balance the associated values of transparency, integrity, and nondiscrimination, as well as other concerns such as free speech and the safety of people and the project itself. Furthermore, boundaries are a fundamental feature of any community, even for those that aspire to openness because it is rarely a simple binary of open or closed. Ultimately, an important explanatory function of the open content community is a number of discussions on how to balance its value. Interesting Problematic users will drive good users away from Wikipedia far more often than good users will drive away problematic ones. — Extreme Unction’s Third Law It reminds me of a pretty sad reality that today has to fac

Summary The trolls in Wikipedia are, in a way, the driving force behind good articles. As it is a highly open community, there are advantages and disadvantages of the inflow of trolls. Early Wikipedia was similar to anarchy. This chapter deals with the characteristics of Wikipedia's openness and whether Wikipedia is really open. Wikipedia users share common norms and rules. It also depends on each other and gives and receives feedback in a friendly way. Wikipedia has the characteristics of open content, transparency, integrity, non-discrimination, defenselessness, and good. Nevertheless, Wikipedia has many controversies, and some experts sometimes liken it to a disaster-ridden place. What is required is the balance between openness and high quality. However, in the process of preventing Wikipedia from simply becoming an anarchic space, access to innocent Wikipedia accounts is sometimes blocked. Wikipedia has "anyone" access, but it must wisely specify the scope of "a

Although Google has 83% of the global search market share, there are still some countries that are not controlled by Google Search.  For example, Naver is South Korea's number one search engine, occupying more than 70% of the search market. 1) Summary ➽  The difference of the original search interface - Google advantages/Naver disadvantages. Naver’s original search interface is richer, showing multiple modules and advertising pages of Naver’s popular products. Since the multifunctional module is displayed and the advertising page accounts for a certain percentage, the comfort of use may be reduced. However, the original Google search interface is relatively simple, retaining the functions of the search box and the content that can be added to shortcuts, making it more comfortable to use. ➽  Different search algorithms - Naver advantage/Google advantage.  Naver's search algorithm is built around Korean, which helps Naver provide more relevant results than Google in many cases, b

Summary A writer defines culture as "the way people live." Within a community, people set up various systems, such as creating meaning from understanding and acting with each other. Among the many concepts that emerge in the community, "collaboration" is similar to the word "conflict resolution". Collaboration and conflict also occur in Wikipedia, a community, which is not necessarily bad. There is a red link in Wikipedia, which makes it a great place for people to complement and collaborate in the process, to promote collaboration within the community. Wikipedia has also a neutral position, which means that people are trying to create objective articles. If an article that affects objectivity appears, people mark the article as "There is an element of conflict" and try to resolve the dispute in a communication space. Of course, it is difficult to define objectivity and to maintain objectivity. People make and accumulate articles with trust towar

When I read the  front region  part of the first chapter, I skipped directly to the third chapter to read it. It turns out that the stage itself can be divided into the  front region  and the back region according to the different functions. So talk about my thoughts on the back region (behind closed doors). 1) Summary Although the back region is no longer part of the performance itself, it is still part of a complete performance. The back region is very important for "work control". This can be proved by the Shetland Islands hotels, radio broadcasting, the "boundary wall" in architectural design, or the examples of dignitaries. The problem of back region control is widespread.  The back region control is also subdivided into different areas: work area, entertainment area and activity place for biological needs. The performer can get rid of the role in the back region to get a chance to relax. For example, the maid in the kitchen can cross her legs in spite of the i

 My thoughts by reading the ‘ front  region ’ part of the performance in the first chapter of "The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life". 1) Summary Part of the  front  region  is stage setting, and part is personal  front  region .  The stage setting and props provided by the stage setting for the performance are usually fixed, referring to part of the scene of expressive equipment, but there is also the possibility of moving with the theme. Personal  front  region  has the distinction of being stable and changing at any time: it can be roughly divided into appearance and behavior. There are two characteristics of  front  region : abstract and general. Abstraction is usually manifested in the rules of conventional procedures. When a person assumes a role, one has to accept a set  front  region , which is easy to choose but not easy to create. 2) New knowledge learned- he actor needs to complete a specific task, but also needs to maintain the corresponding front desk. Since

Summary As it said in the article, Wikipedia's core desire is to increase access to information: to open up opportunities and abilities to anyone who has a desire to learn. Wikipedia’s open statement can be seen in its motto: “Wikipedia, a free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. The success of Wikipedia so far depends entirely on our open community. Only those of us who are involved continue to do the right thing. This community will continue to live, breathe and grow. Wikipedia is an open content community. Because people discuss and make decisions together to create this space together. They share a collaborative culture. An interesting point I learned Compared with other collaborative cultures, there is a clear division of labor between the upper and lower levels. Wikipedia refers to its collaborative cultural space as a community. I think this is a very interesting point. It is open for discussion. Wikipedia is free and open, but freedom and openness are restricted because they

Google Scholar: In terms of academic research, Google Scholar is a web search engine that can search academic articles for free. Its source of information is also professional and rich. For example, articles from academic publishers, etc. There are also most of the published academic journals in the world. It also supports advanced search functions such as keywords, classification and filtering, and you can find the most relevant research documents in the entire academic field in a few seconds. Every search result on Google Scholar will show citations. This provides a good extended search clue, which is convenient for users to directly view related papers. As a Chinese student, even in mainland China, Google Scholar cannot directly access and use it. We will still use VPN and other methods for reference when conducting research. NAVER: And naver is more like an interactive community. There are more academic websites in Korea.  As a Chinese student, I think Naver rarely uses for acade

 Usually, I use Naver to collect information needed for life and Google to collect information needed for academic research. From the main page, the characteristics of each portal site are revealed, and Naver mainly provides information about lifestyle with advertisements, while Google is focused only on search. One of Naver's most useful search functions is a language dictionary. Chinese characters are still frequently used in Korea, and if you draw Chinese characters directly on the screen in Naver's language dictionary, you can search for Chinese characters that do not know the meaning.However, they provide information within Naver before other sites, so there is less information, and there are too many advertisements on every page. And Google's search function using various codes is very powerful. It is no exaggeration to say that you can see all the information in the world, and Google can search a huge amount of information. The downside is that Naver, Korea's lar

Summary Naver should approach the portal that includes search and Google as a search engine. Naver's search results are basically sectioned. Naver can be seen as close to the concept of a portal and database of information sharing comprehensive information. On the other hand, Google's search results are simpler than Naver. Most of Naver's search results are Naver services. Therefore, users who search on Naver will use Naver service, and the second search will also stay inside Naver.  Google exposes most search results to other web pages. Users who search through Google will not stay in Google until another search action. Google has a greater purpose in delivering quality contents. Therefore, Naver can be easy to find information that is tied together and Google can help you navigate through various information. Each advantage Google and Naver have will be the other's disadvantage. Interesting point It would be one of Naver's marketing strategies to make it stay insi

 Summary： Wikipedia’s claim of openness is seen in its motto: “Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.”This makes there must be terrible rumors in Wikipedia. Wikipedia has not helped this confusion given its primary rule of “Ignore All Rules.”  Wikipedia is an open content community.Here, why "jointly participate in discussions and decision-making, and share some practices that both define and be restored by the community".Sharing a collaborative culture.In addition, the Wikipedia community can be further understood as "pro-social" because it exhibits voluntary and beneficial behaviors. Specifically, as an open content community, Wikipedia is characterized by sweeping content, transparency, integrity, non-discrimination, and non-interference. Interesting： I am quite interested in the English Wikipedia declares itself as “the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.”see if it is really a free encyclopedia that anyone can edit?In terms of Wikipedia's

1. Summary Wikipedia's motto, "Free encyclopedia for anyone to edit," shows that Wikipedia seeks openness. Openness and anonymous editing are important identities for Wikipedia. Wikipedia is one of the open content communities where anyone can access and edit and share the results of collaboration with everyone. This has the following characteristics: open content, transparency, integrity, non-discrimination, non-interference. 2. Interesting point Open-source software can be judged by objective criteria such as speed or efficiency, leading to practical mass collaboration. On the other hand, knowledge has no objective criteria for judgment, so misinformation can remain unchanged on Wikipedia, where non-experts participate in editing. The comparison between the two was interesting because open source software and Wikipedia were similar and different. In fact, wrong information is often known because open content communities such as Wikipedia can participate by anyone. Fortu

The pros and cons of using Naver vs Google for research purposes are..  What is the biggest difference between Naver and Google? First of all, Naver, which is firmly maintaining its position as the nation's No. 1 portal site, is literally being used by many people. It's not that people don't know Google, but what they're actually using is Naver.  Then, why do you use Naver? Naver is also a website that reflects the environment of Web 2.0. Instead of just looking at news articles and looking for information, you can provide various services on Naver, such as comments, blogs, cafes, knowledgeIN, and webtoons, share them with people in the community, and communicate interactive. Naver also implemented 'real-time search term service' a few weeks ago, although it is now gone. It was quick and simple to know what people were interested in and what today's hot issues were. Like this, Naver feels more like a community than just a website. And people are used to it. 

Thoughts after reading  'Good Faith Collaboration' and 'The Puzzle of Openness' 1.  Summary A: Good Faith Collaboration I ntroduce d the  origin and history of Good Faith Collaboration ， and Information on Wikipedia policies and guidelines ， from which I learned that mutual respect is the most basic courtesy，All contributors on Wikipedia should be respected. Wikipedia's culture of cooperation –" neutral perspective "(NPOV) and sincere attitude require all participants to build together.   B: The Puzzle of Openness 5 characteristics of the Wikipedia community highlighted ：   a . open-content  b . Transparency  c. Integrity  d. Non-discrimination  e. No interference. 2. I nteresting point Wikipedia’s editing simulation adopts the neutral point of view NPOV (Neutral Point Of View) to avoid Wikipedia’s endless arguments . The principle of neutrality based on the wiki:" to express, on an equal footing, any important opinion ever expressed in a reliable sou

Summary Naver and Google are famous sites that are used a lot for information retrieval. I think they both have different strengths and weaknesses. First of all, Naver is a famous Korean portal site, which is used the most, so it is easy to use because it is familiar and well adapted. Suitable for light searching or information acquisition. Also, it is convenient to check information by category. But the downside is that Naver has too many advertisements. If you search for a particular word, the advertisement comes up first before you get an explanation for it. In addition to Powerlink, there are many posts of inaccurate information such as blogs and cafe posts, so it is not easy to filter out high-quality information. Unlike Naver, Google can be relatively unobstructed by advertisements because only search windows exist on the main screen. Also, the advantage is that there is more specialized data and the amount of data is huge. However, vast amounts of data can be a disadvantage. It&

■ Wikipedia, the open content community ■ Contradiction: Even theoretically perfect openness leads to informal "structure." ■ Wikipedia's Openness vs. Limitations for Maintaining Quality   1) Wikipedia, the open content community I learned about various anguish related to “Openness”, the inevitable attribute of Wikipedia, a representative open content community. Most importantly, in Wikipedia, where openness and freedom must be guaranteed, that is, editing restrictions must be restricted, it relates to cases where the contents of Wikipedia are maliciously attacked. Opinions were made as to whether such restrictions undermined Wikipedia's openness, or whether it was a very small necessity for greater openness. Now, the quality of Wikipedia is maintained by restricting edits to specific pages for a certain period of time to trolls showing malicious edits.   2) Contradiction: Even theoretically perfect openness leads to informal "structure." T