Blogging through Wikipedia (2021)

       In fact, group intelligence class is another major class. The reason I heard this was because of the word 'group'. My major is advertising and public relations, and people are important. It is more important to read human-generated information and human minds than any arithmetic data. But this class of collective intelligence did. Various people edit the parts they are interested in, and on blogs they talk about the parts they are interested in. I took a leave of absence from school last year and worked as an intern at an advertising company, where I felt the importance of looking at what my peers were interested in. So I really wanted to take this class.      During the class, it was good to see what topics people were interested in and what opinions they usually expressed, and it was good to experience writing sheets that were not usually written. In my major, there are mainly three categories: those who write well, those who write well, those...

Why do you think people care about having a civil working environment? Man is not an animal that exists alone. This is especially true in an environment where the earth is full of people like now. Living alone is not a world where you can live well. To adapt to the environment and avoid stress mentally, this world emphasizes compromise with the surroundings. From a structural point of view, work is an essential process that is created for a person to live on. Interested in creating that working environment can therefore be considered an action to live in. If you want to adapt and live, you have to be interested. So is Wikipedia. Wikipedia is filled with information about what phenomena and how people define things. He/she learns and compromises what people promised to define in unison. Human beings are therefore social animals. Have you ever had the impression that Wikipedia's information is handled by a particular class?

       Week 14 reading data explains the Dyk section. The dyk section shows a new or extended article selected through an informal review process. We present a set of hooks to show new and improved content. Some are said to be accompanied by images leading to selected articles. Whether Dyk is suitable or not is determined by four conditions. Four criteria must be met: whether the article is newly written, long enough, correctly written within the policy, and whether the requirements have been reviewed.      It was nice to know about the new section. I felt like Dyk played a similar role to YouTube or SNS algorithms. I thought DYK was somewhat similar to the process of giving me information that I was curious about or that I liked. Five objectives were set out, where I liked the third one very much. Isn't it wonderful to present facts on a variety of topics that may not be exposed to the main Easy? It takes a great deal of effort to bring people to the ...

       Week 13 reading data explains classification. Two types of rules apply to writing articles and dividing children. The first is the general rule and the second is the special rule. General rules mainly deal with naming. For example, topics and categories should generally be singular and category structures should not be written to names. Special rules deal with how articles I write are classified and distinguished from others. In addition, this reading also deals with page separation. It deals with descriptions of user pages and draft pages, making it easy to distinguish. It also covers image/photo classification and template classification, which is good to refer to.      According to the reading material, templates are not articles, so they are not in the content category. However, classification using templates is possible, if used for the purpose of placing them in specific categories. However, reading materials do not recommend this method. ...

     Quality is a very important item in Wikipedia. Articles that are not recognized for good quality are likely to be deleted. Good quality usually comes from the reliability of sources and backgrounds. In particular, reliability is very important because there has been a lot of discussion about reliability due to the platform nature of Wikipedia. There are many ways to increase reliability in Wikipedia editing. You should quote reliable experts, quote articles, or attach other research materials. However, not all academic data or references support credibility, and the credibility of the material must be proved separately.      There is also a visual aspect to determining the quality of Wikipedia. It is also important how well the items are divided and whether the template is used neatly and effectively. It is important to make people want to read, and to value it as reliable information.      What I want to talk about is the difference wit...

       The attached reading material deals with the overall article development section. According to the reading material, the process of writing an article first finds an ungenerated article, builds a stub, and then develops the article. Afterwards, review and peer review can be a good article. The reading material deals with explanations of how to improve the quality of articles. In order to write a good article, it generally suggests that additional research is needed, the behavior of looking for related articles, and the behavior of looking for related books.      I was impressed by the part where the lead section was suggested to be used in the 'writing' section. While reading various articles, I found the lead section and didn't know why the author marked it like that, but I realized that it was to write a better article.  The reference to the feature article was also impressive. I think Wikipedia's signature as the best article was very co...

  Is quality subjective or objective?      I think the quality is subjective. I think subjective data is gathered to form objects. Of course, any machine or product can be judged objectively and evaluated as excellent. But isn't everything a man's assessment. Can the average subject matter be considered an objective? I think it would be better to label it as reliable subjective.      I think objective refers to a case in which the emotions of a creature are not included. For example, that friend's score is 10, and objective score is arithmetic and does not include anyone's feelings. However, I don't think it's possible to say that the preference of this machine is objectively high because the evaluation after using it was mostly positive.      Do you have any experience of feeling subjective about what is marked as objective in the manual or manual of any brand or product?

       The writer of this article discusses leadership in Wikipedia. Wikipedia's early leaders were Welsh and Singer, who dealt with strong leadership and soft leadership. Authoritative leaders are often early authors of community content and therefore take analytical positions on the behavior of these two. Afterwards, he goes beyond the founding leader and mentions the manager and board members. According to him, the need for "dictatorship" stems from the difficulties inherent in decision-making in large, voluntary, consensus-oriented communities. To some extent dictatorship is allowed in the context.      I would like to talk about the leadership set out in the article, including Singer's withdrawal from the community, reflection, and the role of Wales. I didn't think a leader could exist in Wikipedia, which is free to come in and out, but there was a leader. Even the word benevolent dictator showed a pretty good match.      Were you a...

       The writer mentions Wikipedia while presenting the puzzle.At a forum, Wikipedia contributors gather to reveal that Wikipedia is a co-production, referring to the presentation of the puzzle. He chose the technical part first in relation to Wikipedia's success. They argue that it is technology that made Wikipedia work well, and technology that enables openness and accessibility. However, people are somewhat cynical, saying that they emphasize the importance of culture. Wikipedia's position has been questioned even by its founder and continues to be questioned by critics. But Wiki insists it will be a useful resource.       I was a little surprised to learn that the founder of Wikipedia suspected it when he founded it. How did he decide to activate this experimental platform that he wasn't sure about? In order for a person to develop something effective, he or she needs execution power, which seems to have been a strong executioner.     ...

     After reading : Wikipedia:Reliable sources       This reading material provides an overall description of the source. It mainly explains what the sauce is, what the context of using it is, and what kind of sauce is. We also describe how to increase reliability while mentioning suspicious or self-published sources.      I focused on 'self-posted sources' as I read this reading. According to the data, one can claim to be an expert in a particular field based on a personal web page or a book one has published, so one should look carefully. Reading sources suggest that even well-known professional researchers or writers should not use self-published sources. What I find remarkable about this is that ordinary people tend to follow opinions when quoting experts or when experts empower an argument. I thought this part was very important because it was often like that and was considered natural.      Have you ever weighed the...

  The link to this week's reading is Wikipedia's FAQ. Questions are divided into questions about the project itself, copyright questions, technical questions, and questions about the communal community. In the question area of the project itself, Wikipedia explains the overall information about what is available and what information can be uploaded. In the copyright section, questions about licenses, such as uploaded files and images, and questions about the scope and rights of content use are the main focus. Technical questions explain how to upload images, videos, and information, and technical ways to share more quality content. The communal community area shows the answers to questions that can be asked for overall explanation and help. What impressed me was the technical question area and the copyright area. I wanted to make a new article about Korean artists and upload pictures of various works because they were related to paintings. But since the exhibition was closed, I...

      The Internet has changed our daily lives. The Internet has evolved a lot from simply forming networks to leading offline societies. Minor registration, application and participation in daily life are all done over the Internet. Now we can't even adapt to offline society if we can't handle the Internet. The era has come when people can survive only when they know how to use the Internet. Today, the impact of the Internet is exploding due to the constant development and application of digital machines. The Internet has brought us a light and broad relationship. A wide but thin shallow relationship. You can reach anyone anytime, anywhere and find someone who has lost contact with you in just a few clicks. Even if you don't have to think about it and find it, algorithms bring information that you want or need, and information that you easily get without suffering is easily volatile in memory.      I originally liked the Internet very much. The Internet is...

      Remix culture is also called read-write culture. It can be summarized that other people add ideas or information to the content issued or produced by existing original copyright holders to activate it. To make it easier to understand, this includes activities such as taking existing publications to small meetings and talking to each other. As technology advances and people's ability to utilize digital devices gradually increases, restrictions on the format and content of the media have almost disappeared. In this era, remixing culture seems to be at its peak. There are also various areas where remixing is used. From traditional music and artworks to graphic art, books and information, software, movies and videos, there are no limitations.      The relevant discourse can explain copyright. There is controversy over who the copyright holder is and how far it applies because the original author exists and is remixing it. Some scholars argue that laws sho...

       First of all, according to the reading material describing Wikipedia fraud, we find that automated classification systems are better at identifying fraud in Wikipedia than humans, with an accuracy of 86% versus 63%. One way to identify fake articles is to investigate the structure and content of the article, the content mentioned in other articles on Wikipedia, and the function of the editor who created the page. Reading material containing Wikipedia hoaxes shows events so far neatly organized by year.      Another reading explains Wikipedia in popular culture. The details detail the cases in which Wikipedia was mentioned or used in broadcasting stations, entertainment, and art. It also explains Wikipedia's inaccuracies as cited.       Two reading materials are likely to claim similar information. The first states that there were a lot of Wikipedia hoaxes here, but finally shows that they were modified in the end. The second readi...

        I think Wikipedia is reliable. According to this week's class, there are various sources of data. Reliability deepened after seeing various categories such as the type of work, creator, publisher, etc. If I take an example from class, I thought that the Cold War broke out, so I could simply think that the information about it was true. But it can be an opinion that's not true, so you have to be very careful about choosing adjectives for the fact itself. As you point that out one by one, I think I have more trust in Wikipedia. Also, I thought it was reliable when the professor showed me a clear list of trusted sites and unreliable sites. First of all, I think it's double censorship because the trust in the site that we bring as a reference and Wikipedia's own credibility verification are combined.      Based on my experience with Wikipedia editing, some of the edits I made were advised in detail because I doubted the cleanliness, format, and rel...

Summary  This book covers Wikipedia in general. It emphasizes Wikipedia as a unique well-meaning collaboration rather than just Wikipedia as an encyclopedia. It emphasizes Wikipedia's talk pages and discussions, while specifying collaboration and potential. The article refers to technical features that limit vandalism, actions to mitigate potential and legal issues, and internal bureaucracy. As Wikipedia begins, it deals with various external perspectives and the characteristics and structure of Wikipedia itself. Interesting and useful points What's interesting here is that Wikipedia has consistently copied, criticized and satirized over a steady period of time. If criticism and satire exist and the act of imitating Wikipedia itself also occurred, wouldn't Wikipedia's effectiveness be proven naturally? In Korea, celebrities who run malicious comments say, "It will soon become popular to see malicious comments running." Wikipedia, which sparked criticism and sa...

How to add references to a Wikipedia article (Yerin Lee) * How to find reliable sources for research * What are the pros and cons of using NAVER vs. GOOGLE for research purposes. First of all, Wikipedia is described as a socially developing pro-social community rather than a profit-seeking one. Members of the Wikipedia community share common practices and norms. It is a culture of cooperation. The Wikipedia community can be more understood as "pro-social" in that it is intentional, spontaneous, and acts that benefit others. Of course, even if the intention is good, it cannot be unconditionally supported. However, features such as open content/transparency/integrity/non-discrimination/intrusive, and various technical censorship enhance reliability and gain a lot of support. This is supported by the FOSS movement. According to the professor's lecture, we can increase the reliability of our data with reliable sources. To tell you how, it's data like Google Scholar and Go...

Understanding Wikipedia: Wikis and Internet 2.0 ( Yerin Lee) How do we participate in Web 2.0? How do we create the modern-day culture?       According to class content and search, Web 2.0 is a user-participatory Internet environment that allows anyone to easily produce and share data on the Internet without the owner or monopolist of the data. Compared to Web 1.0, which only collects and shows information on the Internet, Web 2.0 is made easier for platforms that provide data so that users can handle data themselves to share and receive information. Blogs, Wikipedia, and Delicious (del.icio.us).         The hashtag is the best feature of the consumer engagement type on Web 2.0. Due to the influence of Instagram, hashtags that are now too familiar to us are ways for consumers to produce, participate in, and expand. Creating and sharing information directly by users means that consumers' capabilities are slightly greater. It also shows how much higher e...

 Week2 - Why Wikipedia? 1). Why do you think wikipedia is becoming more accepted? :  Increased reliability       In order for Wikipedia to gain trust, reliable content must be provided. In this regard, Wikipedia is said to have operated content formed by groups based on thorough standards and rules.       In 2017, according to the blog of the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea, there are a growing number of cases of quoting Wikipedia content in scientific papers. In graduate school, professors are writing content with students in Ph.D. courses and increasing the importance of open access. With increasing quotes and production from experts, Wikipedia is increasing its credibility.       According to this class, Wikipedia is increasingly influencing life and culture. With the public changing to produce content and share it to another public, Wikipedia, which has also increased reliability, is an inseparable platform. 2) Wh...

        -Why are you taking this class?         The reason why I took this class is because I realized the excellence of collectivity during the school break.  I had a short experience working for an advertising company last year. In the case of advertising companies, most of them work as a team. I felt firsthand how efficiently competent seniors in the advertising industry use collective intelligence to handle their work. I want to remember how different people's individuality works and how big the consequences can be. -What practical skills do you expect to gain from attending it? I know that the department that recommends taking this class is the department of information and social media. I would like to find out what other majors have in mind and share their opinions. Also, I want to find out how the problem-solving process will be different from my colleagues in my major. I am also looking forward to improving my English skills in ...