Blogging through Wikipedia (2021)

 The Manual of Style is like a unique editing method of Wikipedia. It can connect to external articles and add comments. At the same time, the unique directory function can also make long articles easier to find by chapter. You can also add pictures at the same time. In this way, the articles on Wikipedia can guarantee a certain degree of uniformity. When I was editing Wikipedia before, I noticed that some articles use table styles to display the data and content in the article, but some are not suitable for tables. Wikipedia will make a reminder in the system to tell the editor that this article is not suitable for table type articles. So how does Wikipedia judge it? Is this part of The Manual of Style? We can see that Wikipedia has done a very good job in The Manual of Style, but the editing of the Wikipedia web page version seems too difficult to read. I will adjust the size of the web page every time I edit it. Don't know that Wikipedia will be improved in the future?

 What did I learn while editing Wikipedia? How is this assignment different from more traditional student assignments? Is it more fun? I have never tried a non-native language text editor before. Before editing, I also doubted whether I could finish this article well, because Wikipedia is a platform for users all over the world. I believe there is more to English articles. Multi-professionals will refer to it. Thinking of these, I think I should edit it more seriously. My article is "Sociology in China". In fact, in the process of studying sociology, I also realized that Chinese sociology-related materials are very scarce (maybe because of some protection measures), and I am searching for related When searching for information, I often found some information with Communist Party colors. I think the main theme of Wikipedia is texts that are fair and non-specific or personal, so I spent a lot of time sifting through the information. I need to extract the non-partisan parts of t...

 Cooperation is open, and collaborative action has become the mainstream, even if it was only a nascent trend in 2008. People's communication and social organization have been precipitated for a long time, and people are connected by large and small groups. People have understood from the primitive times to get the best benefit from the organization. Agriculture leads people into civilization and power emerges. Back to what we often say, technology has brought revolution, so it is inevitable to bring influence to communication and social collective action. The cooperation mechanism is indeed increasingly important in social development. In the ted speech, we know that the deceiver can be punished at the expense of personal interests. The communication mechanism and the interpersonal connection brought about by the cooperation mechanism are more significant today. It is manifested in the field of culture or information, but I believe that cooperation mechanisms and communication mec...

 Dyk is a recent original article with a certain length on Wikipedia. Articles about dyk have very strict criteria for judging. We can enter the dyk page through the homepage, or vote on alternative articles through the page. You can also recommend articles. In my opinion, it is more like an article brought to the homepage through question and answer, attracting more users to participate in the discussion and supplement of the content. I saw that in the dyk's question and voting section, many users left comments to improve the article after voting on the article.

 Categories are usually located at the bottom of the article page. You can link to other articles in the same field through the distinction of categories. At the same time, there will be detailed molecular categories under the category. In fact, classification in Wikipedia is not only for articles, but also for various media content. We also need to pay attention to classification when creating content on Wikipedia. At the same time, classification needs to be distinguished. After reading this article, I found that Wikipedia's classification is more complicated than I thought. From the article, I saw that Wikipedia is different from traditional library classification or website editing classification in terms of classification. It has its own sorting method. You can also find articles on the category page, and you can see the number and importance in the category. There are a very large number of articles on Wikipedia. If you just edit blindly, it will be very confusing. Using the ...

 This article tells us the classification of various articles on Wikipedia. It is not only the writing methods and formats of various articles, but also a detailed introduction of various methods that can help improve the quality of articles. We can see that publishing an article on Wikipedia is not only an end point, it will also have content filling and formatting changes over time in the future, and there will be many people who will help you and help you because of article problems. The article becomes a better content article. I find it interesting that it was mentioned before when we discussed the quality of the article. It is the relationship between time and the quality of the article. Before we concluded that the quality of the article is determined by the current background and era, and the quality of the article is fluid. This point is also reflected in this article, which means that the article in Wikipedia is not fixed, it can be changed and deleted at any time. Do you...

 In terms of cultural content, it is difficult for us to define the quality of this thing from the perspective of time and the background of the times. In my previous understanding of linguistics, the meaning of discourse itself is not determined, and its meaning depends on the language environment when speaking. Over time, the language environment will be lost. Then the original meaning at that time is difficult to be restored. Moreover, in different times, people are limited in the dissemination of information, the scale of speech, the way of expression, and the technologies that can be used. In the law, there is a concept called "prosecution period", not to mention the ever-changing state of information culture and other content. When the Internet was just emerging in the world, the spread was very small, and everyone did not have the awareness of public space on the Internet, as if it was just a technical extension of personal social interaction. Moreover, there was a lac...

I think it is subjective. Because only people know how to appreciate art. It is something that is completely created for people to appreciate. Except people. Get rid of people's minds. Art is worthless. The fact that the art market will become what it is today is the result of free development. It is "objective" at the economic and market level. It's not that a few people can manipulate the market. Artists who rely on advocacy and bragging are vulnerable to the market. There is no denying that the art market in some regions is still immature. Some have made a fortune by means, but then they will disappear. Although the whole is subjective, we must admit that this subjectivity is based on a certain social standard, which is an objective standard formed by a large number of subjectivities. This is also a very interesting point, so I think so, if you have other comments, please let me know.

 Even if I have been using Wikipedia for a long time, I feel that Wikipedia has a very complicated procedure for uploading media. Especially in terms of copyright requirements. I have also searched for pictures that do not require copyright restrictions on other picture sites to use in some of my homework, but when I tried to upload pictures I took on Wikipedia, I found that many terms need to be followed. See Going up is not as simple as downloading and using these pictures. Even if the work is readily available on the Internet, as long as it was created by someone, and the copyright holder has not announced the waiver of the copyright, or the copyright has not expired, the work is still protected by copyright. Copying, dissemination, publication, etc. must be permitted by the copyright holder. Unauthorized copying, dissemination, publication or reprinting of other people's works is an illegal act infringing copyright, and Wikipedia will not condone illegal acts. Although the cont...

 On the cc website, I can easily see that the content about Creative Commons Calls on the EU to Show Clear Support for Waiving COVID Vaccine Patents appears on the homepage. We are all looking forward to our life as soon as possible to return to the state before the virus epidemic, and from this post, I can feel that copyright and all aspects of human society are connected. COVID knows no boundaries, does not recognise the nationality of its victims and if we do not have a global approach to vaccinations, we will never bring the virus under control and end the pandemic. If the global North gets vaccinated whilst the Global South does not, this is a tragedy of our own making and we will all ultimately suffer. You might be getting tired of the virus, but the virus is not tired of you.  In all aspects, copyright awareness exists. With the rapid replacement of cultural products and other products of human civilization that are easily spread, we can easily obtain information and ev...

 After reading remix culture I found that the part that I am interested in is that service technology for persons with disabilities can be exempted from changes in copyright media. I think this is a very culturally beneficial thing. In my opinion, Remix culture is a secondary transformation of the original culture. Just like modern music, we are exposed to popular music and streaming media every day. Few artists have original works. This is defined as the norm, and we also We can feel that there may be similarities with music in other fields in the music we are exposed to. I believe that if representative cultural symbols like The Beatles and Elvis Presley are not processed and integrated in the spread of post-modern culture, their myths may not be as great as we have seen today. It is not only in all kinds of entertainment, such as novels, comics, and music. The knowledge we come into contact with is also in fusion culture. This is the case on Wikipedia. I believe that fusion cult...

I think it is too easy to find these examples. It is hard not to admit that the Internet is intertwined in our daily lives. We are accustomed to using the convenience of the Internet to solve all the problems that arise in our daily lives. It is also because the Internet reduces the differences between humans. For example, I came to South Korea to study as a Chinese student, but I realized that because of the Internet, there is no general difference between the cultures I have encountered with my Korean peers, and there is no unequal information. Everyone regardless of nationality You can come into contact with a variety of cultures on the Internet. For example, songs, thanks to the emergence of streaming media, songs no longer exist on physical substances like CDs and tapes, but are readily available. Even if you come from different regions, you can spend the same time to learn more about the same culture and be called friends. I think the biggest benefit of the Internet to culture is...

The opposite view of the hypothesis of knowledge gap is the ceiling effect, which believes that the individual's pursuit of specific knowledge is not endless. After reaching a certain upper limit, the increase in knowledge will slow down or even stop. Putting it into analysis in today’s society, I think that people with high socioeconomic status can acquire knowledge faster, which means that this “upper limit” has also come earlier. Compared with people with low economic status, although the increase in knowledge is slower, they can Catch up with people of high economic status on the "cap". Then this hypothesis means that the result of mass communication activities is not to increase the digital divide of society, but to decrease it. I personally think this hypothesis is very feasible, because in today's open society, the source of information can determine the upper limit, and what mass communication conveys is not esoteric knowledge but "ordinary" knowledg...

Futurist Don Tapscott believes that recent generations have been bathed in network technology from birth. As a result, the world is also developing towards an open and transparent trend. In the entire ted speech, he mentioned that the new generation is aboriginal in the digital age and has an innate sensitivity to digital media. This speech was made 8 years ago, which means that 8 years ago, he believed that this infinitely expanding digital society would bring good changes to the world. On the one hand, I very much support his view of participating in this open world with zero threshold. In these 8 years, I am also very happy to see that these changes are real. Not only refers to social networks or digital media. As a new generation growing up under the rapid development of the Internet, they are indeed using a brand-new system to break the outdated social rules. We are also very happy to see that the world has become transparent in some systems. system. This promotes the opening and ...

 I think there is no absolute answer to this question. We must analyze each part in detail. When a Wikipedia is supported by sufficient and reliable materials and data, if it is comprehensive and neutral enough at the moment, we can say that it is reliable. However, in many language versions, there are differences in articles, and the source is not necessarily neutral and reliable. Changes and transitions may even occur over time. In this regard, Wikipedia is not 100% reliable. I believe that the original intention of all Wikipedia articles is to create a reliable source of information, based on Wikipedia to make it a reliable information. But this judging standard needs more norms to make it reliable. I believe that with regard to reliability, Wikipedia has more room to develop in the future.

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...

 When do you think we can use wikipedia as a source? In fact, in another course on cultural content, my professor clearly told us that if Wikipedia has reliable source footnotes, then it can be certified as a reliable content support. This point is also my answer to this question. After a few weeks of study, I believe that we have a certain depth of understanding of Wikipedia. It is no longer to edit it at will at the beginning and find relevant ones through Google. To change the information, but to find the actual published content and regular reports to support our content editing. Wikipedia has its own set of criteria for judging whether the source of content is true or not. In my opinion, it is a content judging standard worthy of promotion. At the same time, it can also ensure that the content of Wikipedia is authentic and effective.

 Wikipedia is an encyclopedia in which anyone can participate in editing cultural content. It may not be reliable at this level, because editors do not need to pass relevant qualification exams, and we cannot know whether he is neutral and neutral. Edit these Wikipedia content from an objective standpoint. The reliability evaluation criteria include the need to provide reliable sources in the article, minimize the release of personal opinions, and use these rules to reduce the unreliability of Wikipedia. I think the difference in Wikipedia represents the difference of being educated in the use of culture and technology in modern society. Just like the lack of female-themed content in Wikipedia, part of the reason is that most of the editors are men, and part of the reason is that women's rights were gradually liberated in history. However, ethnography also exists on Wikipedia. In order to maintain a neutral information standpoint, I personally think that in future Wikipedia editing...

  Why Wikipedia is the most efficient of all attempts to collect and organize? I think that Wikipedia comes from coexisting with a large amount of information in the new Internet environment. But processing this information on the same site requires a lot of labor costs. The advantage of Wikipedia allows a large number of users to use it for free, to access articles and academic materials on Wikipedia for free, and to participate in the editing of Wikipedia content as an editor for areas that they are good at. Wikipedia is defined in the words of Jimmy Wales as the sum of human knowledge based on people's desire and pursuit of knowledge. Wikipedia has content in various languages, but the quality of the content in different language versions of the same content is not the same. I think there is room for improvement in maintaining the consistency of content between the various language versions. Do you have any practicable methods for this?

 This book describes the establishment of Wikipedia in great detail. But it is not just to explain Wikipedia as a single individual, but to use Wikipedia as a starting point or as a trigger to discuss the changes in collective wisdom in the development of the Internet in recent years. In these 8 chapters, most of the problems in collective wisdom are discussed using Wikipedia as a carrier. interesting part This book is about Wikipedia culture and accurately describes the social cultural and socio-technical phenomenon of Wikipedia. But I personally think that he raised too many questions about Wikipedia, about neutrality and editing. I think the interesting part is that he mentioned that Wikipedia may bring disputes, but Wikipedia has no effective way to avoid disputes in this area. In the future development of Wikipedia, I expect Wikipedia to find a key point to balance the two. what I learnd While a large number of volunteers participate in Wikipedia, we are also worried that the ...