Blogging through Wikipedia (2021)

1.  Wikipedia's goal is to create and maintain an encyclopedia that covers all areas of human knowledge. In English Wikipedia, hundreds of new articles are created and expanded daily. DYK presents a set of facts (hooks) to showcase new and improved content, some of which accompany images, which are linked to selected articles. The hook appears in "Did you know..." for a limited period of time. We show new and improved content, and show readers continuous improvement and expansion of Wikipedia's article corpus. 2. We present facts on a variety of topics that may not require main page exposure. By acknowledging the work that editors do to expand and improve Wikipedia, it contributes to the retention of editors and continuous improvement of content by encouraging editors to continue to work. Encourage readers to edit articles appearing in DYK or start their own articles to facilitate recruitment of new editors. Good selected articles appear in the DYK box, but feature co...

1. List All Categories Special:The category provides an alphabetical list of all categories, and does not include the number of members in each category. This number does not contain the contents of a subcategory, but contains the subcategory itself, each count as one.The list above includes all categories that have members, whether or not they have the Categories page. Use Special to list all existing category pages, with or without members. 2. Returns the number of pages in "Category:"Example". Each subcategory counts to one page. Pages in subcategories are not counted.Special pages:Category trees allow you to view the tree structure of categories (subcategories, subcategories, etc.). Displaying files and other members pages is optional.You can use the category tree extension to display these trees on all pages. When used in wiki text or transcribed templates on category pages that contain some ASCII statements, they do not work as expected.For existing reasons, {{PAGE...

1. You can make an article about everything on Wikipedia. It's better to search first, so I'm sure there's no article about the title. Before we begin, we recommend that you read the guidelines and tutorials for creating a new document to understand the scope, format, references, and considerations such as NPOV for Wikipedia articles. If you don't have time for the whole article, consider writing a "stub". Stubb is a very short article. 2. The article quality assessment is mainly conducted by members of the Wiki Project who tag the article talk page. To start a stub document, the class=Trump parameter is added to the WikiProject banner in the article on the torque page. If the stub has physical content, you can remove the stub template for the article, which is the physical article. Most articles fall into this category. There may be weaknesses, so you are encouraged to copy them and add content when you have knowledge or do the necessary research. 3. What is ...

1. Our vision is to help others realize the full potential of the Internet. CC has affiliates around the world that help our licences work internationally and raise awareness of our work. CC provides other legal and technical tools to facilitate the sharing and discovery of creative works, such as CC0, a public domain offering for rights holders who want their works in public domains before they expire, and Public Domain Mark, a tool for displaying works in public domains around the world. 2. Use CC licenses and tools to share your work and learn about some inspiring ways to support innovative business models. Information on regularly updated CCs can be found by visiting the blog. Those who wish to make their work available to the public for a limited kind of use while retaining copyright may consider the use of a CC license. Other people who wish to protect all their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses. 3. What does "Some Rights Reserved" mean? Can Creative...

1. Remix culture (sometimes read-write culture) is a ultimate term used to describe a society that allows and encourages derivative works by combining or editing existing materials to reproduce works or products. The growth of proprietary copyright restrictions over the past few decades has increasingly restricted this practice by legal gruesome effects. Remix culture for cultural works involves former free and open-source software for software movement, which encourages reuse and remixing of software works. 2. Remix culture must be shared and created by others in order to survive. This is because the participation culture is established by becoming a contributor, especially because many teenagers who grow up with this media culture participate. This type of lecture strengthens the correlation between participatory and remix cultures, while emphasizing their importance in literary evolution. 3. Students draw images, text, and other information from various source sources in a displayab...

1. This is a list of known historical pranks made by Wikipedia. It is not for a known lie, such as the Filtdown Man, which is remarkable in their own right. Its purpose is to document deception to improve our understanding of Wikipedia and our ability to detect them. Defamation, vandalism, and honest factual errors are not considered pranks. Because many fake things are not being found. 2. You can add manipulations to a page. Don't list realistic articles about Wikipedia April Fool's Day pranks or encyclopedically notable pranks. Start/Delete Date and Length are the days and approximate times when documents are typically displayed. For most operations below, you can view archived versions of deleted documents by clicking the appropriate title. Academic research has investigated the effects and characteristics of Wikipedia manipulation, and proposed automated methods to detect them. 3. While most of Wikipedia's pranks are short-lived (90% of the pranks found are flagged with...

1. The reliability of Wikipedia concerns the validity, verifiability, and verifiability of the user-generated editing model of Wikipedia, especially the English version. It is written and edited by a volunteer editor who generates online content under the editorial supervision of other volunteer editors through community generation policies and guidelines. Wikipedia has a common veto of "anyone can edit at any time" and maintains the threshold of "verifiability, not truth". This editorial model is highly concentrated because 77% of all articles are written by 1% of editors, many of whom are anonymous. Online encyclopedias have been criticized for their realistic reliability in content, presentation, and editing processes. Studies and surveys that attempt to measure Wikipedia's reliability have been mixed with diverse and inconsistent findings. 2. It's a South American coat. In July 2008, a 17-year-old student named the "Brazilian aardbarks" in a Wi...

1. The first chapter of the book begins with the author's methodology and 'Nazi and Norms' that provide an overview of the text. In "The Pursuit of the Universal Encyclopedia," Ragel moves toward the 20th century, exploring the history of encyclopedias and community cooperation. Chapter 3 "Good Cooperation" and Chapter 4 "Puzzle of Openness" begin the ethnographic part of the book. This is represented by "goodwill-based" policies, such as "the best, patience, politeness, humor of others". 2. The next two chapters focus on the decision-making process of Wikipedia. Chapter 5 "The Challenges of Consensus" discusses the nature of consensus decision making within Wikipedia. Chapter 6 "The Beneficial Dictator" discusses the role of the project's co-founder, Jimbo Wales, as well as the less prominent elements of Wikipedia's hierarchy, such as managers, arbitration committees, and the Wikimedia Foundation...

1. Wikipedia, and the cooperative way in which Wikipedia is created, are at the center of heated debate. References can inspire passionate commitment to contributors, but they can inspire seemingly passionate disparagement. In 2004, Michael Gorman, former president of the American Library Association, wrote a critical article about Google and its book scanning project. He was surprised by the negative online response to his work, but this doubled his attacks only a few years later. Despite Sanger's apostasy from the central tenets of Wikipedia faith and establishing resources based on expertise, the rest continue to add to the resentment of many fundamentally flawed professors and school teachers and intellectually lazy to use. 2. Education is a matter of learning, knowledge, and respect for human records. The professor who encourages the use of Wikipedia is an intellectual equivalent of a nutritionist who recommends Big Mac's steady diet along with everything. He's tougher...

1. Wikipedia is certainly misleading in a conflicting world, some documented, and some unique to one's business. An example of an infectious real conflict is the "creation-evolution debate" discussed in Chapter 3. In addition, political and racial differences are often reflected in Wikipedia to form a "working group on racial and cultural editorial warfare". If there is an article in every episode of a television show, how should these articles be named so that they do not collide with other articles? This discussion reveals possible misunderstandings of consensus and difficulties in decision-making practices in open communities. 2. I think this compares with the literature's insights into consensus in other communities, including communities that have built the Internet and the Web using Quakers and "thorough consensus and execution codes". Many things in the history of encyclopedias have been made up of attempts to organize knowledge and how thei...

1. The combination of knowledge claims (epic) and open perspectives on other contributors (mutual) returns to a universal vision that creates special collaborative possibilities and increases access to information and social consensus. Let me explain exactly what "culture of collaboration" means, I also note that there is often a disconnect between written policy and actual practice within the organisation. In providing some history of how wiki came about, I argue that wiki helps bridge the gap between policy and practice. 2. These concepts, and their literature, are useful, but alone, insufficient. For example, the concept of "dispute resolution" is surprisingly optimistic. For this reason, recent textbooks prefer conflict "management" to "resolution," and recognize that agreements and disagreements play an important and inevitable role in the community, respectively. In this way, Wikipedia is like the free and open source software (FOSS) commun...

1. Technology-inspired vision, greater human consensus, is to increase access to information. These elements of good faith culture can be seen in the following conversations about possible "new Nazi attacks" on English Wikipedia. Six months later, Stormfront participants were probably dissatisfied with their initial efforts and were considering creating their own ("forked") version of the software or even some of its content that ran Wikipedia as they wanted. There was also a serious disagreement among Wikipedia people. And even white racists reminded themselves that they needed a positive attitude toward Wikipedia. He pointed out that he posted a list of prominent Wikipedia members as well as information on how to cope with Wikipedia's control of chaos. The conversation between Wikipedia managers was still polite. 2. For example, participants must abide by the norms of "Wikiket," which include guidelines from "Goodwill Assumption" (AGF) and ...

1. More than any other substance, it brings out the best possible amateur ethic. People work hard to love work, not for money. And now, none of us understand anything new without first searching Wikipedia's brain. Anything that intrigues us is to see it cut off. Scholars will spend generations understanding its birth and growth. There are important books that already have a concrete understanding of open source production. 2. When he decided to go back to graduate school to get a doctorate, I was skeptical that so many years would have to rot his tremendous talent.  And as his book convincingly shows, it's a community with families similar to many people in our world. But it's different from anything else. But it is the first time in ten generations that this aspiration for Enlightenment seems possible to anyone but Jefferson. Only a deep reading of this community's culture - as it is a community with a unique culture - can it begin to give access to important lessons f...

1. What is science? What is the difference between this and society? What happens when math and science are combined? We are well aware of the greatness of science. That's why we're living through these things. Science is a great thing for us. This is power and power is a great thing. We believe in the power of science and we need it. Do we really know the power of this? 2. We have science and mathematics. I also know history and society. Are we scientists? Or are you just a mathematician? We know the power of science, so what we need is science and scientific progress. Science is irreversible and what we need is science. 3. Are we scientists? Or are you a mathematician? Or are you a geologist? Or are you an astronomer? Can we be brain scientists? Or can we be a viral biologist according to Calmedis' theory? This is the advancement and power of science. With science we have nothing to fear. That's why we have to believe in the power of this.

1.  The Internet has changed our lives. Change is change and progress. We have to believe in change. Change is an important thing for us. That is why we must believe in the power of change. Do we really believe in change or do we believe in ourselves? That's why the Internet is changing our lives. We know the greatness of the Internet and what we need is the greatness of it. 2.  We must reconsider whether we know the greatness of the Internet. We know the power of the Internet. But the Internet has made our lives prosperous. So the Internet is great and powerful. But the Internet has changed us a lot. It can be good or bad. That is why we need to think again. Do we really know the greatness of the Internet? Or is it simply adapted? 3. Do we know the power of the Internet? Or do you know the greatness of the Internet? Do we know the power of the Internet and Eunitus? How does this relate to the power of Juavo and Ethan Winters? Can this be solved by Ada Wong's law? What does th...

1. Are we Internet addicts? Or is it not an internet addiction? Is this the greatness of the Internet? Or is it a shame of the Internet? We need to think again. Thinking is a very big thing for us. We are different from monkeys because we have an idea. According to the monkey's methodology, this is very self-evident. That is why we need to think again. Is this really an addiction? Or is it just a disease? 2. We often get addicted. Alcoholism or drug addiction is a given. Tobacco addiction, addiction and abuse. But the bigger problem is Internet addiction. What we need is to fight off Internet addiction. Internet addiction brings us a lot of meaning. That is why we need to grasp the semantic meaning of Internet addiction. That's why we need to get away from internet addiction. 3. What do we need? Are we Internet addicts? Or are we Internet addicts? Is our existence doomed to Internet addiction? Or is it what the Internet wants that we fall into? Is the Internet created by the ex...

1. Does Internet addiction exist? My answer has always been there. This is exactly how it can be expressed. This is it. Internet addiction exists and is my answer. There's only one reason I thought this way. This can be said to have been made by me on some principle. It can only be expressed in one way. This is it. This is that Internet addiction is addiction. Addiction is something that shows addictive symptoms. That's why we need to know the greatness and fear of addiction. 2. The addiction is enormous. It is also incredibly bad. Addiction is a scary thing. But addiction also has tremendous power. The height of this fear is the fear of addiction. Addiction is scary because it is addiction. That's why addiction is scary. But we can see the power of addiction. That's why we need to know the fear of addiction. 3. Internet addiction is addictive, addiction is treated Or is it just a disease? Is this great or not great? This may or may not be the right thing to do, accordi...

1. Times change. And we change, too. Opposition is in favor and opposition is in opposition. Water becomes fire and fire becomes water. Air becomes solid and solid becomes air. That is why we must prepare for change. This is a very dangerous idea and can sum up our lives. But what we need is true love. For what we need, we'll have to experience a lot. 2. The world is bound to change. But we have to change, too. What we need to catch up with the world is change. That is why we must prepare for change and change. It doesn't work if I change. We need to make changes for change. That is why we must live through the greatness of change and change. 3. What is change to us? What changes do we need? Is this really a change? Can this be the answer to what change is? What is the difference between this and change? What answers can we give to change?

1.  We must refute that. This is wrong and something we must refute. What is refutation? Refutation is a rebuttal. That is why we must oppose it. In its opposite approach, the opposite is a rebuttal. But we have to think again. In its approaching methodology, refutations are counter-arguments and counter-argument. That is why we must refute and learn more about the principle of rebuttal. 2.  We are aware of the greatness of rebuttal. However, it is impossible to implement such a thing for a number of reasons. However, we must refute that. Because the greatness of this comes from the rebuttal. That is why we must live separately between refutation and opposition. The greatness of this can be said to be the extremes of refutation and opposition, and the extremes of opposition. 3.  But is this in favor if you oppose refutation? Can this be refuted by opposing the motion? Where does its greatness come from? We have to experience greatness, but what should we do to experience ...

1. It is important to keep someone out of reach. This is especially important on the Internet. That is why we should allow this. Just feminism can be as one example. They are not very good. That's why they spread their ideas to many people. That is why we must stop them. They are world-class rocks and we agree with that. They should all be off limits and are our rockers. We must exterminate them and shoot them with shadow guns. 2. It is important to prevent access to the internet. In particular, efforts should be made to prevent unidentified things. But we are far too generous. That's why we have to put as much effort into it as possible. But we're letting this slide because we're so generous. That's why we have them all, feminism should be resolutely eliminated should strangle themselves. 3. What kind of censorship are we under? Is this simply censorship? Or can we say that's what we need? Is the greatness of this a preferential or hypocritical approach? Where ...