W3: (Extra credits) How do we participate in Web 2.0? How to create the modern culture?

● How do we participate in Web 2.0?

●How to create the modern culture?

The soul of a Web 2.0 website lies in "sharing", which has two basic characteristics: openness and interaction. Through the communication model pictures, it is found that what Web2.0 brings us is a readable and writable network, This readable and writable network shows that the user is a two-channel communication mode, That is to say, the interactive relationship between web pages and users has evolved from the traditional "Push" model to the "Two-Way Communication" model of two-way communication. For example, "Wikipedia" uses the power of users to create the world's largest Internet encyclopedia.


• How do we participate in Web 2.0?

Let me tell you from my personal experience. Personally, I will actively participate in various websites to comment and share my opinions. On SNS, I expand my network based on the friends who know my friends. Especially in China's popular TikTok platform,I often post videos to share with other users, and other users will make various comments. I will reply to them in time and listen to their opinions on how I can better shoot videos. Over time, my fans gradually increased. Therefore, we should actively participate in exchanges and sharing, such as our own stories, and the fun of raising pets and so on. 


• How to create the modern culture?

Web 2.0 websites have changed the traditional information dissemination mode. We can share the modern culture of our country with users around the world, such as: food culture, relationship culture, language culture and so on. Exchange the cultural differences with other countries. Let other countries know more about their own country’s culture and so on.

• problem

As an important place for cultural production, consumption, services, and communication, the Internet will also have adverse effects on us, such as the spread of fake news, cyber violence, etc. So what do you think the adverse effects will bring to you?





Comments

  1. Yang Ruixin 양서영March 19, 2021 at 9:28 AM

    Hello，I quite agree with you. With regard to your problem, I think the suicide of Sherry, a member of the Korean idol group F(X), is proof that the Internet age has brought convenience to both of us and hurt us.
    Cyber violence is supposed to a new crime of the twenty-first century, which has left many suffering, and many people still use it to attack others even if the law has rules and restrictions on it now.
    If we want others to respect us, we should be able to make online communication without attacking, insulting, slandering, or creating or spreading false information about others.

    ReplyDelete
  2. HARI KIM 김하리March 21, 2021 at 4:28 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. HARI KIM 김하리March 21, 2021 at 4:31 AM

    I read your article and thought about cyber violence, one of the negative effects of the Internet. According to a 2021 survey by the Korea Communications Commission, 6 out of 10 adults said they had suffered various types of cyber violence, including personal information leakage, honorary loss, and bullying. The survey also found that cyber violence experiences increased compared to the previous year. The fact is that the seriousness of cyber violence is increasing. Cyber violence is not someone else's business, it's something we face that needs to solve. I think it is necessary to strengthen cyber ethics education and prevent provocative content from being produced.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more