W3: What is Wikipedia / Lee ye han

Summary

Wikipedia, which has a vision of "Imagine a world in every single hman being can free share in the sum of all knowledge," is one of the most famous sites in the world. It is an online encyclopedia opened in 2001 with various languages and users.

On Wikipedia, anyone can edit or edit the article, so it is freely available.

You should not plagiarize when editing Wikipedia. In addition, biased or inaccurate information should be avoided.

 

New / Interesting things I learned

I learned many things because I don't know much about Wikipedia yet. The most fascinating thing was that Wikipedia warns itself when it writes plagiarized articles.

I thought it was a good rule to be warned several times due to plagiarism, which limits the right to write. Since anyone can edit the text freely, there may be problems with the revised content, but I thought Wikipedia's system would prevent the problem.

 

Discussion point

Why is Wikipedia less popular than other developed countries in Korea?

I think it is because there are many other famous portal sites in Korea. There are many sites that people already use as collective intelligence, such as Naver, Daum, and Nate. 

I think Wikipedia is relatively unpopular because it is more familiar and easy to get information from the original use. For example, if you post something you are curious about to an '지식in', people who know it come and leave comments and communicate with the questioner. Or post about your experience or knowledge on a blog and people see it and get information. I think this way is too familiar.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more