W4: After reading "The Puzzle of Openness

 

1. Summary

Wikipedia is free and open, but not everything is free. Wikipedia is not about examining the limitations of anarchism, but rather about creating an encyclopedia. This will cause problems if anyone uses anonymity to post on Wikipedia about gossip that is on and off people's lips. Although openness can be suggested as an advantage that anonymity brings, it poses a risk. 

The phrase "Allow anyone to edit" needs to consider how much possibility it implies for those who want to exploit Wikipedia's strengths.


2. Interesting Point

Leaving the responsibility for the freedom given by anonymity to the public puts a lot of pressure on Wikipedia. It was interesting to discuss how to regulate this to the right extent and whether to maintain Wikipedia's color.
As a person who feels and accepts the darkness of the anonymity of the Internet more seriously, I felt that I needed to think about it.


3. Discussion Point

I wonder if detailed regulations on problems arising from anonymity are possible. I think there are problems when operating the real-name system, but I think it would be desirable to prevent people suffering from anonymity in advance.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

W8.2 Why Wikipedia is the most efficient of all attempts to collect and organize? / 진신

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

W15 : What did I learn while editing Wikipedia? How is this assignment different from more traditional student assignments? / Park Chan Young (박찬영)