W 7. Good Faith Collaboration /양서영(YANG RUIXIN)

1. Summary

An online encyclopedia, Wikipedia (Wikipedia), is built by a community of wiki men, in which people want to communicate with each other "assuming they are honest ". Joseph Reagle examines this unique culture of cooperation in Good faith Cooperation.


Reagle believes that maintaining an open perspective on knowledge claims and other contributors can create extraordinary cooperation potential. Wikipedia's culture of cooperation brings us closer than ever to a century of universal encyclopedias.


As we all know, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, Riegel analyses the openness of Wikipedia and the challenges it faces. He explored the process of reaching consensus on Wikipedia and studied the way leaders and authorities work in an open content community.

2. Interesting Point

ee-sharing, universal encyclopedias，The difference between Wikipedia and those projects is its culture of integrity, This is reflected not only in writing and editing articles but also in discussion pages and editing history. Wikipedia is a good product for collaboration among users on the planet ー, but it has nothing to do with its product design. I believe any product designer can draw a conclusion: Wikipedia product design is very bad, with cumbersome editing and messy layout.

But the Wikipedia community has built Wikipedia, the builder, soul builders, souls, and masters of Wikipedia. They are willing to spend a long time on Wikipedia sparing no effort to write every entry, check every change, and help every new editor.

3.Discussion Point

So how does Wikipedia do this?

In my opinion, the most fundamental reason is that Wikipedia treats users like "participants ", not" consumers ". Wiki's mission is to pass all the knowledge of the world to everyone on the planet in local languages. The only purpose of the Wiki community is to work together to create this free, free and best quality encyclopedia. For the purpose and purpose of Wiki, Wiki people have high requirements and standards for the civilization of the Wiki community, so they respect each other's honesty, communication, and fraternity to create this pluralistic, free, tolerant, and honest Wiki community and encyclopedia.

How does Wikipedia change the world? But it wasn't Wikipedia that changed the world, it was Wikipedia's editors, Just as it was not Martin Luther King, who changed America, but the millions he called.

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more