W5: After reading “The Benevolent Dictator”

 

1).

Open, civil, equal, deliberate. This concept is part of the characteristics seen in the universal encyclopedia. Considering these characteristics, it can be felt that leaders should not exist in a universal encyclopedia. However, any community is peaceful with a leader. So what does Wikipedia's leader look like? The article mentions Wales a lot as a Wikipedia leader. Wikipedia's culture of good was shaped by Wales's values and actions, which helped that Wales establish many of Wikipedia's essential values and norms. An informal benevolent dictator, like Wales, plays a role in gently leading communities, mediating internal disputes, and defending the malicious.


2).

Wales has patience, politeness, humility and a willingness to apologize. This image of him made a benevolent dictator. There is one more thing that cannot be omitted from this. It's called humor. I would say that a benevolent dictator with humor is 'a person of gentle charisma.'


3).

We have met many leaders in our lives. And the leaders show different charisma with their own characteristics. Let's think about the leader you've met so far and talk about what attitude you need to become a person with 'soft charisma'!

☞   I think Magnanimity is necessary. When a person breaks the rules or fails to keep his promise, the leader should not be angry immediately after recognizing his or her fault. We need to know the background of why the person made a mistake. To do this, a leader must have a broad mind.



Comments

  1. Jung jisoo, 정지수April 3, 2021 at 5:29 AM

    I read your writing well. And I would like to write my opinion on the gentle charisma.
    I think it is necessary to have an empathetic attitude for gentle charisma.
    Through empathy, people can understand the actions and feelings of others. I think this can lead to good communication. In addition, I think that through empathy, we can build trust with each other and move toward the same goal in a more cooperative attitude. Therefore, I think empathy is necessary for soft charisma.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Han SuyoungApril 4, 2021 at 5:52 AM

    I read your post well too!I would like to talk about the discussion you talked about.
    I think “listening” is the most outstanding quality of a leader's qualities for soft charisma.
    A leader is a position where you have to listen to the opinions of the group and make decisions or give directions. Therefore, I think that the attitude of knowing how to wait after listening to the other person's opinion is the most necessary for a leader.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more