W10 After reading – Remix Culture

 Remix Culture

Shinhee Kim

Summary

Remix culture is the creation of new creations by reproducing existing materials. Remixes are carried out in various fields such as folklore, books, software, music, and movies, and are also carried out across fields. In the analog era, remixing culture existed despite being limited due to the disadvantage of damaging the quality of copying works. And with the advent of the digital age, the remixing culture could become very active. Various application creations were created with open source software. In addition, due to the bidirectional nature of the Internet, various contents can be accessed easily, and individuals can also create creative contents using them.

What I learned

In the field of religion, it was found that remix culture could occur by making the Bible more easily interpreted. In addition, even in the analog age, there was a limited but remixed culture, and I learned anew that there was a movement of change.

Discussion

Sometimes people abuse the remix culture to infringe on other people's copyrights and plagiarism. In the boundary between remix and plagiarism, what kind of system should people prepare to keep their originality?


Comments

  1. Yerin LeeMay 8, 2021 at 7:00 PM

    I think the guarantee of remix culture, plagiarism, and originality is inseparable. The legislature defines a number of laws on copyright, but the pace of increase in people's content utilization capabilities makes me feel like the speed of legal guarantees is not catching up. I think people should change themselves if there are limitations and difficulties for the nation to solve. Shouldn't we conduct social campaigns or similar campaigns on the issues you mentioned and establish people's thoughts?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more