W10: How important is privacy for you and what are we doing to protect it?

 

∎ How important is privacy for you and what are we doing to protect it?


1.

'Privacy' means to the daily life of an individual. So it's 'time' to act comfortably without caring about others. If these times are violated by others, they should not spend their daily lives comfortably and always suppress themselves. To put it simply, you have to live without taking off your suit for business. If this happens, the body and mind may continue to be exhausted and may not behave properly in public situations.


2.

Currently, I don't do SNS such as Instagram or Facebook to protect my privacy. In other words, I try not to share my daily life with others. Also, whenever I have time, I block people who are not close to me from my Kakao Talk friend list.


3.

Journalists are the first thing that comes to my mind when I think of 'privacy'. Journalists confront accusations of privacy violations, claiming "people's right to know." What do you think about this?



Comments

  1. Shinhee Kim, 김신희May 8, 2021 at 3:00 AM

    Youngsil, I read your opinions well. Journalists insist on the right to know and overly infringe on people's privacy. Journalists sometimes abuse rights as obligations and spread privacy. In this situation, I think it is necessary to have legal restrictions and that users who use the media do not consume such articles. I think that this is a very serious problem because once exposed to privacy, the person suffers irreparable damage.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yerin LeeMay 8, 2021 at 7:10 PM

    Does the journalist you're talking about mean journalists in the entertainment department? If you're talking about them, I'd like to raise my hand that privacy should be kept. If a person's life is exposed to too many people, it will be too mentally impoverished. There are opinions that celebrities should earn unusually much money and risk privacy violations, which I think needs to be reorganized to the abnormal profit structure, not justification for privacy violations. And if there's another accusation of ethical conduct like Burning Sun incident, Such a privacy report would be legitimate. right?

    Speaking throughout the press, it feels like the right to know should come first. Actually, I don't have exact grounds or ideas. But I think the pure function of 'the press' is too powerful.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more