W10: Remix culture (최재민)

 1. summary

The concept of copyright on Wikipedia is very different from that of existing copyrights. Basically, copyright means a kind of permission is needed when using someone's work, but copyright on Wikipedia is different. It is a more progressive concept. Copyright on Wikipedia can be seen as a concept of 'sharing'. This is because others can freely modify, use, combine, or decompose their works, which is impossible without Wikipedia's free concept of copyright.


2. interesting

It was interesting to mention the concept of copyright itself. In fact, I have never considered copyright while using Wikipedia, but it was impressive to talk about it because copyright has always been a problem whenever I use any document. Wikipedia's promise of "sharing" seems to mean a lot.


3. If it's a really well-made document and a complete document that doesn't need to be added or modified, can Wikipedia put an unmodifiable document on it? If Wikipedia could, should it acknowledge its work on the document?

Comments

  1. If the article, which appears to be well-organized, provides sufficient public interest to people, and for that reason, the article needs to be well-organized and exposed to the public for a long time, I think it would be good to preserve it as an "unmodifiable document" for a period of time.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei