W11 After Reading – Wiki Commons

 

W11. After Reading – Wiki Commons

Shinhee Kim

Summary

Wiki commons is a space where people voluntarily provide free media. Excluding text, you can upload various images, videos, and sounds, and all contents uploaded here can be used freely inside and outside of Wikimedia. Therefore, you cannot upload any images, and you can post works for which you have copyrights for free or upload only files with a free license. When uploading files, the files are not classified by abstract general keywords, but into categories that are subdivided into subcategories. The explanatory text of the uploaded image may be automatically modified through localization for various countries.

What I learned

What's new is that people can't later revoke licenses for images they've already uploaded. Images that have already been released for free cannot be changed simply except in very limited cases. I've also relied on search so far to find images on Wiki Commons, and I've noticed that there are a variety of subdivided categories.

Discussion

With so many free resources available, are there any special tips I can use to find the image I'm looking for? There are subdivided categories, but it would be nice if there was a way to find the composition or size you want.


Comments

  1. MINKYO JEONG, 정민교May 16, 2021 at 2:52 AM

    Shinhee, I read your post well. As you mentioned, I was also very impressed with the license system and detailed categories. It seems to have been carefully designed for accurate retrieval of information and concerns about licensing disputes.
    Also, I am curious about how to find the exact image I want. For example, how can I find a picture that resembles an image drawn in my head?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more