W11: Wikimedia Commons

1. Summary: Uploading content to Wikimedia

I was able to see the general information about the format and method of the content. In simple terms, Wikipedia Commons is one of several wiki series, and is a site where media contents are stored.

Content uploaded here must follow a shareable license, and you cannot use other people's works without permission. This is because the materials uploaded here should be freely available to anyone, but bringing a work published by another person is an act of overtaking.

In addition, I learned about details about the resolution of the image I uploaded, but as anyone can think, it is difficult to upload an image that is too large.

Of course, the resources here are available on Wikipedia.

 

2. What helped

It was interesting about categorization. The categories are subdivided deeper than I thought, so it's nice to be able to put them in detailed categories when uploading certain media content. As a huge amount of media has been uploaded, it seems to have been subdivided into such a depth.

We can also publish this category ourselves, in which case we just need to look at the structure of the other categories and learn the rules and follow them.

In addition, the explanation of the case where the image is blocked and invisible was also impressive. In conclusion, the user's computer with the advertisement blocking program installed recognizes the image as an advertisement due to specific words in the address of the image and does not show it.

 

3. Topics to be discussed

What are the benefits that anyone can get by uploading their own photos to a sharing platform? Also, can the licenses of the images uploaded here be 100% completely managed? Can you perfectly catch other people's content without permission?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more