W4. What are the pros and cons of using Naver versus Google for research purposes? / Chaeeun Park

Naver versus Google for research purposes

Naver and Google have differences. Naver is a function of the portal, but Google has a strong search engine. Naver's search results are sectioned. Naver search results are close to the concept of a portal that provides various information such as blogs, advertisements, and cafes. Google, on the other hand, offers much more basic search results than Naver. Google has a strong nature of a search platform to deliver useful information.

In that regard, people get different information through Google and Naver. I use Naver when I want to get content information in most situations. For example, when you want to see a review of a good restaurant or a substantial review of a product, you can get a variety of information. On the other hand, Google can get a lot of information really quickly through what it calls Googling. From papers to books can be found at once. Google is much more useful when doing assignments.

Google and Naver have their own strengths and characteristics. It would be meaningful if people thought about under what circumstances they use Google and Naver.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

W8.2 Why Wikipedia is the most efficient of all attempts to collect and organize? / 진신

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

W15 : What did I learn while editing Wikipedia? How is this assignment different from more traditional student assignments? / Park Chan Young (박찬영)