W4 What are the pros and cons of using Naver versus Google for research purposes? / Han seung gu

Naver versus Google for research purposes 


Naver and Google would be the most representative portal sites in Korea. I also use Naver and Google together, because each of the advantages and disadvantages of Naver and Google is different.


Naver is more of an information-producing machine than a search engine. When I look at Naver, I feel confident that I can produce all the information in the world. There were so many functions besides information retrieval that it was difficult to focus on information retrieval. Rather than producing a lot of information on their own, they ask bloggers, cafes, and businesses to get information. As a result, the quality of information is poor, but it can be obtained in countless fields. But crucially, it only deals with information produced by Naver.

Google is faithfully fulfilling its search engine mission. I feel like I paid a lot of attention to the quality of the search engine. There are fewer commercial posts, and articles for information delivery are placed at the top. Unlike Naver, the range of information is much higher because it handles all the information produced by all portal sites.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

W8.2 Why Wikipedia is the most efficient of all attempts to collect and organize? / 진신

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

W15 : What did I learn while editing Wikipedia? How is this assignment different from more traditional student assignments? / Park Chan Young (박찬영)