W9: Review of List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/ Suyoung Han

 Review of List of hoaxes on Wikipedia


1) Summary – List of Hoaxes on Wikipedia

The list of hoaxes on Wikipedia is a collection of fake articles from Wikipedia. Wikipedia made this entry to document the scams on the wiki so that the next fake material doesn't appear. It is organized from hoax articles to hoax statements, and the materials are detailed from more than 10 years to less than the most recent year. Frauds consist mainly of false people, geography, books, programs, and false statements in various fields.

2) Interesting Point – The Importance of Cataloging

Surprisingly, people are writing hoax articles in different ways, and it's the first time I've learned that Wikipedia is listing articles. And after confirming that there were scams discovered over 10 years ago on Wikipedia's list, I was terrified that there might be some hoax articles are hidden in Wikipedia as I was editing.

3) Discussion point – Impressive Hoax

Among the list of hoaxes, which article impressed you the most?

- Chemical formula (NaO2H90−8Mg4S2Ci2 Al2Si2He4Fe2CaN2C) was the most interesting to me. How did you know this? And how did you know that this was wrong? I thought that the person who made this and the person who figured out that it was a hoax was really amazing.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more