week3 - after reading

1.
Technology-inspired vision, greater human consensus, is to increase access to information. These elements of good faith culture can be seen in the following conversations about possible "new Nazi attacks" on English Wikipedia. Six months later, Stormfront participants were probably dissatisfied with their initial efforts and were considering creating their own ("forked") version of the software or even some of its content that ran Wikipedia as they wanted. There was also a serious disagreement among Wikipedia people. And even white racists reminded themselves that they needed a positive attitude toward Wikipedia. He pointed out that he posted a list of prominent Wikipedia members as well as information on how to cope with Wikipedia's control of chaos. The conversation between Wikipedia managers was still polite.

2.
For example, participants must abide by the norms of "Wikiket," which include guidelines from "Goodwill Assumption" (AGF) and "Please Don't Bite Newbies."  The relationship between Wikipedia and Wikipedia and their relationship to the technology, discourse, and vision of the universal encyclopedia asks: How should we understand this community's culture of cooperation, "prejudice"? I understand this question in the next chapter, but I will introduce it first. In other words, a universal encyclopedia vision of access to information and promoting goodwill can be found. Richard Schwab, a scholar of the Enlightenment and Encyclopedia, wrote that thinkers at the time "continued to recognize that they were the forces of the world" and that they "had a new sense of solidarity and power to move human affairs forward."

3.
Historian Richard Herr describes the universal principles that underlie many of the cultures of enlightenment as "ideal". The little things found on Wikipedia are a source of joy for some and a source of ridicule for others. Our community has already come from a wide variety of backgrounds, and its diversity will only increase over time. The only way to coordinate our efforts in an efficient way to achieve the goals we set for ourselves is to love our work and love each other even when we disagree. You can try to reach a higher standard than the Internet usually recommends: rational benevolence and love. "Quietly and sanitarily, this new encyclopedia will not overcome this outdated contradiction. It will steadily, but imperceptibly deprive them of their present reality."


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more