W2) After watching Mitch Resnick's video /박채정, PARK CHAEJEONG

 https://www.ted.com/talks/mitch_resnick_let_s_teach_kids_to_code (Professor recommended)


 In the video, Mitch Resnick says that getting used to something is different from getting used to it. Even if current digital tool is familiar to us, there is a limit to how we apply and express it. So he constantly studies new technologies not only to be 'familiar' but to be 'skilled'. Perhaps the reason why he created and developed a program called 'Scratch' is because he wants to deliver such a message to us in the end. Wouldn't it be to tell them to think in various ways, have the necessary posture, and have another idea, not just learn how to do it? In other words, I think we can experience more if we develop more than the conventional one. 

 This video reminded me of the professor's question. Is the university useful? Personally, I think it is useful in that I can learn what I want to learn in depth. No, I thought. As mentioned above, if we are only studying theory, we will only get used to the theoretical aspects. 

 So I don't think that university is useful yet. We should not be satisfied with learning theory, but we should develop further. I think there is a limit to producing the best results by theory alone. I mean that the experience gained through various trials and errors can produce better results. In this process, we will find out what is lacking and what needs to be supplemented. Therefore, in order to become a useful university student, I think we need to learn more by developing many variables that we meet. And shouldn't universities help and support students to have various experiences like this?



Comments

  1. HARI KIM 김하리March 13, 2021 at 1:29 AM

    I could think a lot about your opinion that universities are not useful yet. Today, I think universities know that practice is more important than theory. In college, we practice expressing and sharing our opinions rather than simply reading them. Therefore, I think universities are useful. However, if it continues to develop into an education that values creativity.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more