W2 : Things We learn in college.

 

∎Universities often teach you theoretical stuff that is mostly useless in real time

 

I don't agree much with the idea that universities often teach useless theoretical things. First of all, in order to talk about this, we must definitely define what 'useless' means. "Useless" means that there are no areas or parts that will be used, which in other words does not help us in our daily lives. So, are the subjects we often learn in college really not helpful in our daily lives?

I think it's a little hasty to say yes to this question. We don't only learn 'A' in the class that teaches 'A'. You can learn something else, such as cooperation, from various activities such as team projects and reports, which are carried out to learn "A". In other words, we learn a number of indirect things in class besides the direct things that the school wants to teach.

Of course, the ultimate purpose of the class may not be of any help to our daily lives. However, it should not be overlooked that the indirect things we learn in the class can be of sufficient help in our daily lives.

I would have fully agreed if it were the same opinion that "the key that universities want to teach us through classes is often useless in our life." :)

Comments

  1. 박채정 Park ChaeJeongMarch 13, 2021 at 6:35 PM

    I agree with this article. In the reading materials uploaded by the professor, Joseph Reagle took a step closer to his dream, gaining knowledge from various fields. In other words, it was true that "every knowledge does not interfere."

    I also definitely don't think there's anything 'useless' about learning in university. Because we can broaden our knowledge and experience. However, I think university should help students develop further through various practices as well as theory.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yerin LeeMarch 13, 2021 at 11:26 PM

    Hi Youngsil, I want to say that I read your post well. I agree with your posting! In fact, I had a lot of doubts about whether it would be useful to learn in school until the second year of college. But last year, when I was working as an intern at a company, I thought it was definitely helpful! I've been worried if I've been spending my time on useless things, but I felt good because I think I worked more effectively as much as I invested my time in my major.

    Also, as you know, our major is not revealed to be a department that studies people on the surface, but the process of studying people is essential, right? I think the assignments that I didn't know about make me grow without realizing it! Of course, it may be conceited, but there are times when analysis of people has worked to some extent!

    ReplyDelete
  3. 이현영 Hyeonyoung LeeMarch 14, 2021 at 7:35 AM

    I agree with your point. I don't think that theoretical things to study at university are useless because there are so many complex things that work in our lives.

    For example, the theories I learned during Geography class help me plan trips, and the theories related to volume learned during science class helped me cook. Also, after learning about the culture of a country I'll never be able to go in my life, my understanding increased a lot when I saw works related to that country at a museum,


    Therefore, I think that the theories I learned at university are not simply useless and that when they are combined with my daily life, they will bring value to our lives.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more