W4 : What are the pros & cons of using Naver versus Google for research purposes? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary

Naver intuitively shows where I can find information by connecting it with dictionaries, blogs, and external links when searching. However, Naver is too self-centered. Let's say I want to search Impressionist artists. Naver mainly shows information generated within it, such as people's descriptions of Impressionist artists through Naver blogs or the definition of Impressionism in Naver. This is a negative factor when someone wants to know various information.

On the other hand, Google shows a vast amount of data. It shows Naver posting, related papers, and almost everything that contains the search keyword someone entered. It is good to look for a lot of information, but there are many data that need to be filtered out : unreliable data, too old-fashioned data, etc. But it would be great to use Google for research purposes if someone could filter these things out.

2. Interesting point

Naver has been troubled by real-time search terms and biased news layout. In 2018, Naver decided to leave a link to its news homepage instead of directly posting news on the main page, and in February 2021, Naver concluded that it would eliminate the real-time search term system. Looking at this situation, I thought that Naver's main homepage would become like Google someday.

3. Discussion point

In addition to Naver and Google, Youtube is now a big search platform. 

Why do people use Youtube for search even though they can only get information after watching the video?

Comments

  1. AnonymousMarch 26, 2021 at 2:04 AM

    I think the problem of society, where the burden of reading is increasing, can emerge through YouTube. Reading and considering the text becomes awkward, and only fast, light, and stimulating information stands out in the swamp of information. People now think that the video is more interesting than the text.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sohee HeoMarch 26, 2021 at 2:06 AM

    I think the problem of society, where the burden of reading is increasing, can emerge through YouTube. Reading and considering the text becomes awkward, and only fast, light, and stimulating information stands out in the swamp of information. People now think that the video is more interesting than the text.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Piotr KoniecznyMarch 26, 2021 at 7:32 PM

    I am always very interested in reading the answer to this question!

    ReplyDelete
  4. HARI KIM 김하리March 26, 2021 at 11:40 PM

    Now, it is time to search on YouTube. People think it is easier to get information by video than by textual information. In addition, the percentage of people using YouTube as a search engine is increasing because they want to see what they are curious about through videos and want to get detailed information through videos. However, it should be careful not to consume provocative content and false information on YouTube.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Park Chan Young (박찬영)March 27, 2021 at 6:30 AM

    When people use YouTube to search, I think there are many things like how to use something. I think people are using YouTube as a search engine because it is faster to understand the demonstration with their eyes than with their writing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more