W4) Wikis and Internet 2.0 /박채정, PARK CHAEJEONG


Summary

 Web 2.0 refers to an Internet environment in which anyone can produce and consume data, rather than owning or monopolizing it. In other words, it is an Internet space centered on user engagement. 

 Web 2.0 consists of two-way communication that allows information to be accepted and shared, rather than the traditional Web 1.0 method of unilaterally communicating information. It is fundamental to play the role of the Internet and television and to do more than that. The best part is that you can communicate with everyone around the world anytime, anywhere. It is a community that has a tremendous impact to form another trend and change culture. 

 I thought these features of Web 2.0 were only made on SNS such as Instagram and Facebook. However, Wikipedia is also part of the Web 2.0. It hasn't been long since I knew and used Wikipedia, so far, the process of finding and modifying informations myself is very unfamiliar yet. But, I think it's very meaningful and I'm adjusting to participating in the webpage (WikiPedia), not just uploading pictures on SNS.



A new/interesting items learned

 When I searched to find out more about Web 2.0, I already saw an article saying that the era of Web 3.0 will come. Until now, I had to distinguish unnecessary information by myself in the vast amount of data. However, in the coming future, I can find only the information I want right away without such a process. Therefore, I felt that it was necessary to actively respond to the rapidly changing online environment rather than to accept the information as it is.



Discussion point

 In the future, we will definitely be able to do what we want to do comfortably and easily. But on the contrary, is there anything we should think about that we miss in a society that is changing too fast? Is there any problem that also occurs? Is it all good to make our lives convenient? I think we should be able to make more ethical and rational judgments. I wonder what you guys think.


Comments

  1. 김윤(KIM YOON)March 28, 2021 at 5:30 AM

    With a variety of IT technologies and faster Internet speeds, we will be able to live a more convenient life, as you say. But we have to keep asking the question of whether we are invading the ethical part ourselves because we can overlook the ethical part of it. And no matter how much the world develops, humans live in communities, so we need to balance ourselves well so that we can create a healthy community through healthy discourse with people and then pursue convenience in it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more