W4/What are the pros & cons of using Naver versus Google for research purposes?/HARI KIM

What are the pros & cons of using Naver versus Google for research purposes?

  

Summary)


Naver, the No. 1 most-used search engine in Korea, and Google, the world's No. 1 most-used search engine, have many differences and pros and cons. 

First of all, Naver has a search window on the top of the main screen and various posts are exposed in various categories, including news, blogs, and shopping. On the other hand, Google's main screen has only a simple search window. 


There was also a difference in search results. Naver usually lists various contents such as advertising, news, blogs, cafes, and shopping when searching for any information keyword. Google, on the other hand, mainly shows research documents on information, such as Wikipedia. In other words, Naver exposes a variety of content that best matches the keywords, and Google first shows content containing basic information. Therefore, when using Naver and Google for research purposes, Naver will be useful only when it wants quick answers to questions, and Google will be useful when it wants to find detailed research information on questions. Naver has the advantage of being divided into contents and looking well organized, and Google has the advantage of showing accurate quality content. Depending on the research situation, it would be better to use both engines properly.

 


New/Interesting things I learned)


I learned that Google provides a lot of quality information, such as Google books and Google scholar. In addition, Naver also creates public opinion through contents exposed to the main screen, but it was interesting that Google only had a search engine on the main screen. I thought maybe Naver will gradually change like Google. 



Discussion Point) 


I think it is also an ability to find the right information well. Google has a lot of information, so there will be different information depending on Googling. Do you have any Google search tips? I hope we can share it together.  



  

Comments

  1. Jung jisoo, 정지수March 27, 2021 at 4:19 AM

    I have read your opinions on the pros and cons of Naver and Google and agree with them. I also think that both sites can be useful depending on the purpose of the search. I also use Google a lot when researching materials for assignments, but it often takes a long time to find the suitable materials because there is so much information. So, I took this opportunity to find out how to do it more efficiently when searching Google. The tip I would like to share is to search in the format "keyword site:site name(키워드 site: 사이트명)". In this way, we can search for the information we need only on the site we want. As there is so much information, I think it will save a little time if you search this way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HARI KIM 김하리April 4, 2021 at 4:50 AM

      Thank you for your opinion. That's why I've learned a new way to search in the form of "Keyword Sites". If I search only the information I need on the site I want, I think the speed and quality of information retrieval will increase. Let's all googling well!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more