Week 1 - Direct experience and interactive communication

       

-Why are you taking this class?        

The reason why I took this class is because I realized the excellence of collectivity during the school break. I had a short experience working for an advertising company last year. In the case of advertising companies, most of them work as a team. I felt firsthand how efficiently competent seniors in the advertising industry use collective intelligence to handle their work. I want to remember how different people's individuality works and how big the consequences can be.


-What practical skills do you expect to gain from attending it?

I know that the department that recommends taking this class is the department of information and social media. I would like to find out what other majors have in mind and share their opinions. Also, I want to find out how the problem-solving process will be different from my colleagues in my major. I am also looking forward to improving my English skills in communication through interaction with my professor. It's a class that I haven't experienced before, so I look forward to various experiences and growth. Thank you.

Comments

  1. MINKYO JEONG, 정민교March 6, 2021 at 8:06 PM

    I agree that collective intelligence is important in the field of advertising.
    Through this class, I am sure that it will be helpful to real work, gaining a fundamental understanding of collective intelligence. In particular, I think that we can learn more effectively if we focus on social interactions between people.

    Also, it is interesting to know students majoring in various fields share their opinions and attend classes.
    I am also interested in that because I am not a student majoring in sociology. Unfortunately, during this semester, this class will be held online. So It's such a bummer since we don't have much chance to see how students majoring in sociology communicate in person.

    I hope you get what you want through this class.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more