W5: Do you think Wikipedia is right to reject censorship? / Lee ye han

 My opinion


I think Wikipedia is right to reject censorship.

Wikipedia is an Internet encyclopedia where anyone can freely share and participate in knowledge.

In other words, it is a field of collective intelligence that people make by collecting accurate information.

However, if censored by any institution or person, Wikipedia's vision or purpose is likely to be completely ignored.

Also, I think censorship is not right because it is hard to determine whether the subject and standard of censorship are objective.

 

If there is a false content or obstruction in Wikipedia, it is correct to delete it, but due to the nature of collective intelligence, users of Wikipedia can correct it or correct it inside Wikipedia.

It would be difficult for people to freely share knowledge if censorship is conducted from the outside.

 

Considering these points, Wikipedia thinks it is right to reject censorship to protect the identity of the site.

Comments

  1. 진신April 3, 2021 at 2:50 AM

    In Wikipedia, the relationship between volunteers is also communal supervision. I think this has played a vital role in maintaining good faith collaboration of Wikipedia.Whether the subject and criteria of the review are objective, it is actually difficult to consider.But it must be specified according to the characteristics of a specified area.In this way, Wikipedia loses its original meaning after being censored. The censorship system has its pros and cons. The refusal of censorship is to ensure the autonomy of Wikipedia. However, if it is censored, Wikipedia will lose its autonomy and at the same time improve its rule management.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W4: What are the pros and cons of using Naver vs Google for research purposes?

Google Scholar: In terms of academic research, Google Scholar is a web search engine that can search academic articles for free. Its source of information is also professional and rich. For example, articles from academic publishers, etc. There are also most of the published academic journals in the world. It also supports advanced search functions such as keywords, classification and filtering, and you can find the most relevant research documents in the entire academic field in a few seconds. Every search result on Google Scholar will show citations. This provides a good extended search clue, which is convenient for users to directly view related papers. As a Chinese student, even in mainland China, Google Scholar cannot directly access and use it. We will still use VPN and other methods for reference when conducting research. NAVER: And naver is more like an interactive community. There are more academic websites in Korea.  As a Chinese student, I think Naver rarely uses for acade
Read more

W2 : After watching Mitch Resnick’s TED video

 Through this video, I realized that programming education is not only as deep and professional as I know it, but also more flat and interesting. With the change of the times and the advancement of technology, the times we experience are indeed constantly changing. I believe that programming is just a way of learning like reading. It does not depend on any subjective intentions but exercises people’s logical thinking and creativity. China There is a common saying that “giving others fish is better than fishing for others.” I believe that programming does not exist as a short-lived technology, but behind it is that people need to keep learning with the times and have an open attitude. The purpose of early childhood education is different from the professional education we receive now. Early childhood education is more inclined to teach children the way of thinking, rather than the part of applying knowledge or technology in a professional subject as we are now learning. Therefore, addin
Read more

W13/After reading “Categorization”/HARI KIM

Summary) Categorization is a kind of list for dividing topics, and it helps users find information easily. All documents must be in at least one category. Therefore, categories must be well chosen. How are the numerous articles on Wikipedia categorized? First, the category should be chosen as the most helpful topic when someone reads the article. And usually an article doesn't exist in both the top and the subcategories at the same time. If there are few documents in the category you have in mind, you should check to see if they belong to a subcategory. It is also important to maintain a "neutral" perspective when categorizing. New/Interesting things I learned) I learned that usually one document does not exist in both the upper and subcategories at the same time. Before I knew this information, I had made a mistake in categorizing documents. In categorizing articles about rivers, the article was already part of a subcategory, but I have made mistakes by adding a top cate
Read more