W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / WANG XIAOLING, 왕효령


1. Summary

This book details the origin and historical development of Wikipedia. In addition, it also introduces the collaboration culture of Wikipedia from the perspectives of honest cooperation(Maintain a neutral point of view and edit in good faith sincerely), openness(Non-discrimination, transparency and integrity, gender), and challenges of disputes and convincing cases were also presented. To explain why the unique culture of Wikipedia is a success and why it is a miracle today.


2. Interesting / Useful point

Wikipedia positions itself as an encyclopedia that encompasses all areas of human knowledge, rather than a dictionary, online forum, or anything else. Secondly, Wikipedia allows wide public participation, and it is a collaborative project. In addition, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with open content, which allows any third party to copy, modify and redistribute any part or all of the material without restrictions. In this participatory age, interactive learning models like Wikipedia are bound to thrive. 


3. What I learned from reading it

Because Wikipedia is based on the Internet, contributors from all over the world may use different dialects when browsing the same language version of Wikipedia, or may be influenced by the idioms of different countries, causing slight differences in their language. These differences may lead to conflicts in the spelling or usage habits of the items, or the influence of the social environment of different places makes different opinions on the content of the items. Therefore, implementing a "neutral point of view" in various language versions of Wikipedia reduces controversy. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more