W8: Reliability of Wikipedia/진신

Summary

Wikipedia:Reliable sources’ describes what reliable sources can be used in Wikipedia articles. How to use these reliable sources correctly. Or which articles are unreliable and cannot be used.

Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered.

Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish the opinions only of reliable authors, and not the opinions of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. 

Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.

 Interesting

Breaking news point:It is better to wait a day or two after an event before adding details to the encyclopedia, than to help spread potentially false rumors. 

As students of the Department of Journalism, we deeply understand that it is a long process from the occurrence of a report to the end of the follow-up report on this event. As short as 3 to 4 days, as long as several decades. It is difficult to publish the entry of the event before the event is completely settled.How do you think the items for the incident report should be written? What kind of source is reliable?
 
Discussion
How do you think the items for the incident report should be written? What kind of source is reliable?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

W4: What are the pros and cons of using Naver vs Google for research purposes?

W2 : After watching Mitch Resnick’s TED video

W13/After reading “Categorization”/HARI KIM