W8.2 Wikipedia: Reliable sources / 최재민

summary

Wikipedia should not be covered. Wikipedia must always be based on reliable data and no documents can be created if the data is unreliable. All documents should be based on neutrality, but some do deal with a non-neutral positive view. This is based on Wikipedia's diversity, and sometimes non-neutral data is inaccurate. People need reliability and the ability to develop reliable data.


interesting

It was impressive that Wikipedia did not necessarily have accurate and neutral articles. This is at odds with the credibility of the previous chapter. But I think it's good to have more diverse documents.


discussion

What do you think of various, opinion-based documents, if slightly inaccurate? Is there a need for more documents like this?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W8.2 Why Wikipedia is the most efficient of all attempts to collect and organize? / 진신

  Because every entry of Wikipedia needs to be verified by a reliable source. Coupled with the constant dedication of tens of thousands of powerful volunteers, Wikipedia is the most efficient of all collection and sorting attempts. Not all entries in Wikipedia are highly efficient. Some of the hotspots that have attracted everyone’s attention are prone to produce a lot of feelings, because Wikipedia attaches great importance to the verification of content, any subjective remarks will soon be treated as original research, and high-quality content is in this way. It was born out of babbling and being killed as an original research What is the most important function of Wikipedia for you？
Read more

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W15 : What did I learn while editing Wikipedia? How is this assignment different from more traditional student assignments? / Park Chan Young (박찬영)

1. What did I learn while editing Wikipedia?  The most important thing I learned from editing Wikipedia is the joy of participating in collective intelligence. Before the class, I only used Wikipedia. But I was given the opportunity to edit Wikipedia through class. It is difficult than I expected to edit a steady every week. But I was pleasantly able to edit the idea that my hard work contributed to making a better encyclopedia. The joy felt when I found a topic that lacked explanation became the driving force for editing. I thought it was a small group of people and I thought it was their job to create a collective intelligence. However, as I edited, I realized that spontaneity and enjoyment were very important factors in creating Wikipedia. 2. How is this assignment different from more traditional student assignments?  The assignment in the other class was usually to write a report. It was a task to write an individual's arguments or t...
Read more