W12: Thoughts after reading "Wikipedia:Article development" . WANG XIAOLING, 왕효령

 1) Summary

After reading it, I have a deep understanding of how Wikipedia articles are developed, such as each stage of the article, development articles and featured articles. In addition, I learned in detail how to write articles on Wikipedia, find related articles and books, and so on. In fact, when I edited Wikipedia before, I didn't know where to create the article that Wikipedia needed to create. I often searched and found that Wikipedia already had this entry. But after reading this Wikipedia, I finally know where to find a good way to create articles.

2) Interesting point

What surprised me was that the original evaluation of Wikipedia articles was peer-reviewed, which may not be the same as peer-reviewed in real life. It's really interesting!


3) Discussion point

After reading, I think Wikipedia articles are worthy of being a source of academic papers. What do you think?

Comments

  1. HARI KIM 김하리May 23, 2021 at 6:08 AM

    I read your writing well. There are some great articles in Wikipedia that have gone through some of the stages of article development, but I think there are some articles that need to be revised that are unreliable. Because many people are given free editing rights. It is good to refer to when you want to see ideas and thoughts on related topics, but I don't think it can be the source of academic papers.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

 1. Summary  The Internet has changed our culture so much. First, through the Internet, we can meet people regardless of distance. People in each country communicated over the Internet and reduced the barriers to distance by creating relationships. Also, the Internet has let us stay away from books. When we want to find expertise, we can get it from Wikipedia or Google. Even information in books can be obtained through e-books, reducing access to libraries and paper books. 2. Interesting point Further to the above, our brains are gradually degenerating because we don't have to remember information. We are constantly interrupted by SNS notifications ringing on our phones when we do something, so our concentration and attention are being reduced. Furthermore, the ease of obtaining information online is causing our short-term memory to decline. 3. Discussion point I think the Internet has made it easy to sever a relationship with a person because we can meet another person simply...
Read more

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

  Review of Good Faith Collaboration 1) Summary – Wikipedia from an ethnographic perspective: focusing on collaboration within the community Wikipedia, which is called the world's largest encyclopedia, is an open community and is becoming more and more solid with the participation of various people, conflict, and resolution. In this respect, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. attempted to explain the culture that takes place within Wikipedia. The book describes how Wikipedia was created and what it values. In particular, he described Wikipedia in a book from an ethnographic point of view, and focused on cooperation within the community. 2) Interesting Point – Wikipedia is simple, but not I realized that Wikipedia is not just a site made up of community activities, but rather a collaborative activity that is carried out concretely for the goal. Before I read the book, Wikipedia was an encyclopedia site that only gave me information (even I didn't trust the information), and I thought ...
Read more

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei

 Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? In terms of the comprehensiveness of the content, we have to admit the advantages of Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia is undoubtedly my first choice when I don't understand an event at all. It is convenient, fast and comprehensive, and I can spend the least time to understand the whole content of this fact as comprehensively and neutrally as possible. But in the process of in-depth learning, Wikipedia can only be used as an introductory content, because in learning we need to understand this fact as much as possible, and we need to understand the different views of scholars in different regions on the same event. There will be different theories. Some theories seem to be not neutral or even discriminatory or ethnographic at present (such as Marxism and Marxism in China), and it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Be shown. In short, Wikipedia has a very low threshold for users. It assu...
Read more