W13/After reading “Categorization”/HARI KIM

Summary)

Categorization is a kind of list for dividing topics, and it helps users find information easily. All documents must be in at least one category. Therefore, categories must be well chosen.

How are the numerous articles on Wikipedia categorized? First, the category should be chosen as the most helpful topic when someone reads the article. And usually an article doesn't exist in both the top and the subcategories at the same time. If there are few documents in the category you have in mind, you should check to see if they belong to a subcategory. It is also important to maintain a "neutral" perspective when categorizing.


New/Interesting things I learned)

I learned that usually one document does not exist in both the upper and subcategories at the same time. Before I knew this information, I had made a mistake in categorizing documents. In categorizing articles about rivers, the article was already part of a subcategory, but I have made mistakes by adding a top category. Therefore, it was interesting to learn about categorization and I learned a lot from this lecture.


Discussion Point)

The criteria for categorizing plants are not the same all over the world. Even in the same country, the criteria for categories are different. Taxonomic views sometimes diverge over a plant. As such, the categorization system varies from country to country and from scholar to scholar. Then what criteria should we categorize in this case? What views should we follow? I'm curious about your opinion.

Comments

  1. 진신May 28, 2021 at 9:43 PM

    I think the classification system of each country and region represents the perception of people in that country. Articles in different languages under the same entry are just for the convenience of people from all over the world to browse entries in their national languages. Therefore, I think that articles in different languages should be ranked according to the classification of each country.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HARI KIM 김하리May 30, 2021 at 11:03 AM

      Thank you for your opinion. I was interested in your opinion that Wikipedia is divided by language, so it can be categorized according to each country's perception. However, if the perception of each scholar is different in the country, which scholar should we follow? I was curious about this, too.

      Delete
  2. Lee ye han (이예한)May 29, 2021 at 6:11 AM

    The discussion point is interesting. There are various perspectives and standards for each country, but I think it is right to classify them based on what is most commonly thought.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W4: What are the pros and cons of using Naver vs Google for research purposes?

Google Scholar: In terms of academic research, Google Scholar is a web search engine that can search academic articles for free. Its source of information is also professional and rich. For example, articles from academic publishers, etc. There are also most of the published academic journals in the world. It also supports advanced search functions such as keywords, classification and filtering, and you can find the most relevant research documents in the entire academic field in a few seconds. Every search result on Google Scholar will show citations. This provides a good extended search clue, which is convenient for users to directly view related papers. As a Chinese student, even in mainland China, Google Scholar cannot directly access and use it. We will still use VPN and other methods for reference when conducting research. NAVER: And naver is more like an interactive community. There are more academic websites in Korea.  As a Chinese student, I think Naver rarely uses for acade
Read more

W2 : After watching Mitch Resnick’s TED video

 Through this video, I realized that programming education is not only as deep and professional as I know it, but also more flat and interesting. With the change of the times and the advancement of technology, the times we experience are indeed constantly changing. I believe that programming is just a way of learning like reading. It does not depend on any subjective intentions but exercises people’s logical thinking and creativity. China There is a common saying that “giving others fish is better than fishing for others.” I believe that programming does not exist as a short-lived technology, but behind it is that people need to keep learning with the times and have an open attitude. The purpose of early childhood education is different from the professional education we receive now. Early childhood education is more inclined to teach children the way of thinking, rather than the part of applying knowledge or technology in a professional subject as we are now learning. Therefore, addin
Read more