W15: What did I learn while editing Wikipedia? How is this assignment different from more traditional student assignments? Is it more fun? / Suyoung Han
Wikipedia Report
What did I learn while editing Wikipedia?
Editing Wikipedia, I
learned how to systematically gather information. In addition, I was able to
learn more about how collective intelligence is actually formed, and the
benefits of collective intelligence by participating in the process.
The term collective
intelligence was often used with friends. In a major class where he often
worked on team assignments, he used the term 'Collective Intelligence' as a
meme. Before taking the class, I thought that collective intelligence was just 'a group of people working together to finish a common goal'. However, as I
edited Wikipedia and joined the collective intelligence, I learned that my view
was narrow. I came to realize that the information created by the collective
intelligence requires processing, and since it is working with others, I need
to be more careful, and I need continuous feedback. Also, because I was working
with several people, I was able to learn anew that others should bring and use
information from reliable sources, and follow common rules when writing
information.
Through this class, I was able to understand the overall system of
collective intelligence and I think it will be useful when I get a job and
collect user data and use it to create new results.
How is this assignment different from more traditional student assignments?
I think the previous class
assignments were just about collecting data and using them to create new ones.
Most of the assignments were performed centered on creativity. So, the data was
not emphasized, and the data was used as a means to derive ideas.
However, I think that
'data' was the most important for this task. The data itself was important,
such as where the data came from when it came from, and whether the source was
a reliable medium and I think the focus was on clearly describing the data. In that regard, through this class, I think I was able to learn clearly which data
to use and which data to be called the “best” data.
In addition, the existing
classic classes simply produced results such as giving presentations or
submitting reports, but for me to check them or show them to others, additional
activities were needed, such as creating a portfolio or posting materials on
other sites. However, since this task was done on a site called Wikipedia, I
could easily check the articles I participated in and also see the
contribution, so I could easily see how much I was involved in the project. In other words, it was very nice to be able to see my results comfortably without
any additional activities.
Is it more fun?
It was hard, but it was
fun. In particular, it seems to be a joyful experience that I have never
experienced before to have the results visualized and remain on Wikipedia as
much as I have suffered. In fact, it was difficult to find sources for the
data.
In particular, the ‘Autumn
Uprising of 1946’ that I edited was an event that took place in 1946, and all
the historical materials were made up of old materials. For that part, I
couldn't find it in a paper or Google book. So while I was vaguely thinking
about the source, I searched the school library with the professor's feedback,
and luckily was able to find a related book in the preservation library. It was
difficult to find the data, but I was proud of myself and my team at the
thought that it had become reliable data that much.
Comments
Post a Comment