WEEK 8 - After reading : Wikipedia:Reliable sources / Lee Yerin

     After reading : Wikipedia:Reliable sources 


     This reading material provides an overall description of the source. It mainly explains what the sauce is, what the context of using it is, and what kind of sauce is. We also describe how to increase reliability while mentioning suspicious or self-published sources.


     I focused on 'self-posted sources' as I read this reading. According to the data, one can claim to be an expert in a particular field based on a personal web page or a book one has published, so one should look carefully. Reading sources suggest that even well-known professional researchers or writers should not use self-published sources. What I find remarkable about this is that ordinary people tend to follow opinions when quoting experts or when experts empower an argument. I thought this part was very important because it was often like that and was considered natural.

     Have you ever weighed the right and wrong of a professional's words? For example, have you ever raised an agenda in your class? I think it's a pretty courageous act, so I wonder if you've had that experience.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

W10 : Can we think of some example of how Internet has changed our culture? / 박소민(SOMIN PARK)

W7: Review of Good Faith Collaboration / Suyoung Han

w9: Its often said by teachers that “Wikipedia is a good place to start, but a bad place to finish” why? LiuXinlei